Possible typo in AC_WITH_LTDL

2004-01-10 Thread Peter Eisentraut
In m4/ltdl.m4 I see AC_ARG_WITH([included_ltdl], [ --with-included-ltdluse the GNU ltdl sources included here]) Shouldn't that be AC_ARG_WITH([included-ltdl], ^ ? It doesn't really make a difference when you run it, but it looks incorrect.

Re: Possible typo in AC_WITH_LTDL

2004-01-10 Thread Kevin Ryde
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Shouldn't that be > > AC_ARG_WITH([included-ltdl], > ^ No, it's the name of a variable. ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: Possible typo in AC_WITH_LTDL

2004-01-10 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Kevin Ryde wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Shouldn't that be > > > > AC_ARG_WITH([included-ltdl], > > ^ > > No, it's the name of a variable. The first argument of AC_ARG_WITH is the (partial) name of a command-line option, not a variable. The comman

Re: Possible typo in AC_WITH_LTDL

2004-01-10 Thread Kevin Ryde
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The first argument of AC_ARG_WITH is the (partial) name of a > command-line option, not a variable. Oops, yep, its munged automatically for the variable. ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http: