Re: Problem with /.libs/.libs/ during link

2004-04-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Dan S. Camper wrote: Thank you VERY much for the prompt and -- better yet -- working fix! Thank you. Note, I just applied the attached patch to branch-1-5. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com Index: ChangeLog 2004-04-29 Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * ltmain.in: Fix p

Re: Problem with /.libs/.libs/ during link

2004-04-29 Thread Dan S. Camper
In our last episode, on 4/29/04 9:02 AM, Peter O'Gorman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something like: > Dammit, looks like I only fixed it in HEAD, not branch-1-5. :( > > Looking for the patch now this looks like the relevant bit. Can you > please apply it and confirm a fix, thanks. > > Peter > -

Re: Problem with /.libs/.libs/ during link

2004-04-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Dan S. Camper wrote: I just updated one of my systems to libtool 1.5.6, ran libtoolize to ensure that the support files in my conftools/ subdirectory were updated, then executed autoheader, autoconf, 'make distclean' and ./configure to bring everything back to square one. Unfortunately, the probl

Re: Problem with /.libs/.libs/ during link

2004-04-29 Thread Dan S. Camper
In our last episode, on 4/28/04 6:48 PM, Peter O'Gorman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something like: > Dan S. Camper wrote: > >> >> Oh yes: The libtool I'm using is: >> >> #: ./libtool --version >> ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5 (1.1220 2003/04/05 19:32:58) >> >> Thoughts? > > Libtool-1.5.6 may fix

Re: Problem with /.libs/.libs/ during link

2004-04-28 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Dan S. Camper wrote: Oh yes: The libtool I'm using is: #: ./libtool --version ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5 (1.1220 2003/04/05 19:32:58) Thoughts? Libtool-1.5.6 may fix this problem, please try it. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com ___ Libt

Problem with /.libs/.libs/ during link

2004-04-28 Thread Dan S. Camper
Greetings! I'm running into a link error when trying to build a suite of libtool-managed libraries. Google turns up many people complaining of similar problems, but I didn't find a solution. Executive summary of the problem: A single makefile is building seven or eight libraries, all built via