On May 10, 2001, Ganesan Rajagopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know about the -Wl flag. I some how got the idea that -Xlinker is a
> libtool flag which will use the appropriate option to pass it to the linker,
I believe libtool supports both -Wl, and -Xlinker, and translates it
to -Wl, if it
Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
>
> > "Robert" == Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think you can get the exact same result by using the
> > -Wl,-Bsymbolic flag. It will be recognized by Libtool,
> > and passed to the linker. -Xlinker is a gcc equivalent
> > to -Wl, so if I recall
> "Robert" == Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think you can get the exact same result by using the
> -Wl,-Bsymbolic flag. It will be recognized by Libtool,
> and passed to the linker. -Xlinker is a gcc equivalent
> to -Wl, so if I recall correctly, that would only work
> when
Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am currently using -Bsymbolic to compile my libraries. I pass in the flag
> using "-Xlinker -Bsymbolic". Is "-Bsymbolic" portable and if it is can the
> flag be added to libtool directly. Linux, FreeBSD ELF, Tru64 and Solaris
> seem to support it (with the
Hi,
I am currently using -Bsymbolic to compile my libraries. I pass in the flag
using "-Xlinker -Bsymbolic". Is "-Bsymbolic" portable and if it is can the
flag be added to libtool directly. Linux, FreeBSD ELF, Tru64 and Solaris
seem to support it (with the same flag), but I am sure there will be
