Howard Chu <> wrote:
> Duft Markus wrote:
>> Are there any opinions on this. Should i simply say, that this
>> libtool feature is not available with wgcc/windows? This would mean,
>> that i would have to somehow disable *all* code generation in
>> libtool... Are their an objections against this?
>>
Duft Markus wrote:
Are there any opinions on this. Should i simply say, that this libtool
feature is not available with wgcc/windows? This would mean, that i
would have to somehow disable *all* code generation in libtool... Are
their an objections against this?
That's probably OK in the shor
Hi again!
While thinking about the C++ support on windows, i stumbled over a
problem i had with WGCC a while ago. C++ mangled names are not valid C
identifiers. This doesn't sound too bad, but it really is. Since they
are not valid identifiers, one cannot generate a C-source file that
contains suc
