Re: autoreconf vs. libtoolize when upgrading to libtool 2.2

2008-07-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Scott, and sorry for the delay, * Scott James Remnant wrote on Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:21:25AM CEST: > > We've switched the default version of Libtool in our development version > to 2.2, and are doing such migrations as are necessary to permit this. Great. How come you're not going straight

autoreconf vs. libtoolize when upgrading to libtool 2.2

2008-07-23 Thread Scott James Remnant
Hey folks, We've switched the default version of Libtool in our development version to 2.2, and are doing such migrations as are necessary to permit this. In the progress, we've encountered an interesting difference between the behaviour of autoreconf and libtoolize that leaves you with a broken