Re: libtool fails with uninstalled frameworks and the -F flag

2014-02-01 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hmm, -F should be passed through unmolested. # Flags to be passed through unchanged, with rationale: # -64, -mips[0-9] enable 64-bit mode for the SGI compiler # -r[0-9][0-9]*specify processor for the SGI compiler # -xarch=*, -xtarget=* enable 64-bit mode for

Re: libtool fails with uninstalled frameworks and the -F flag

2014-01-31 Thread Michael C. Grant
Gary, Sorry for the delay. I think I'm going to have to give up on this one. I'm afraid my understanding of libtool internals as well as Darwin -framework idiosyncracies are insufficient to the task. Fortunately, the issue we were having with Octave compilation has been resolved by other

Re: libtool fails with uninstalled frameworks and the -F flag

2014-01-14 Thread Michael C. Grant
Please keep the -L and -F branches separate, factoring the branch bodies into a shell function if necessary to prevent cut-n-pasting blocks of code between the two. Bonus points if you could also make -F behave as before on all platforms but *-darwin*. I'll do that. If you have github,

Re: libtool fails with uninstalled frameworks and the -F flag

2014-01-13 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Michael, [moved to libtool-patches list] On Jan 14, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Michael C. Grant m...@cvxr.com wrote: I'm trying to compile GNU Octave and its new Qt GUI on a Mac OSX with Homebrew. Homebrew installs the Qt frameworks in /usr/local/Cellar/qt/4.8.5/lib, so after some fiddling with

libtool fails with uninstalled frameworks and the -F flag

2014-01-13 Thread Michael C. Grant
I'm trying to compile GNU Octave and its new Qt GUI on a Mac OSX with Homebrew. Homebrew installs the Qt frameworks in /usr/local/Cellar/qt/4.8.5/lib, so after some fiddling with the configure script I get this: QT_LDFLAGS=-F/usr/local/Cellar/qt/4.8.5/lib QT_LIBS=-framework QtCore -framework