In regard to: Re: use of __STDC__ in libtool.m4 on HEAD, Gary V. Vaughan...:
>> Why? Some C compilers define __STDC__ but don't define it to 1. How
>> about:
>> #ifdef __STDC__
>
>I believe there are compilers out there that define __STDC__ to 0
>for strict K
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:43:26PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >From libtool.m4 in HEAD branch:
>
> #if defined (__STDC__) && __STDC__
> # define lt_ptr_t void *
> #else
> # define lt_ptr_t char *
> # define const
> #endif
>
> Why? Some C compilers define __STDC__ but don't define it to 1.
>From libtool.m4 in HEAD branch:
#if defined (__STDC__) && __STDC__
# define lt_ptr_t void *
#else
# define lt_ptr_t char *
# define const
#endif
Why? Some C compilers define __STDC__ but don't define it to 1. How
about:
#ifdef __STDC__
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
___