Re: FYI: new libtoolize autotests [libtool--devo--1.0--patch-107]

2005-04-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:29:25PM CEST: * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 07:25:22PM CEST: Applied to HEAD. Nice patch except for the brown bag below (and someone I mailed for assistance in a completely unrelated bug to actually check out the

Re: FYI: make libtoolize's pkgvdatadir a private api [libtool--devo--1.0--patch-105]

2005-04-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Gary, Hallo Ralf! OK to apply this fix? In principle I like the patch, but I wonder if we should abstract out the setting of _lt_pkgvdatadir so that it is exported to the environment for the duration of the whole testsuite? If you agree, then I think we should also

Re: Speeding up libtool

2005-04-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 09:06:25AM CEST: * Robert Ă–gren wrote on Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 01:30:26AM CEST: With ash and lt_ECHO=printf...: I think the disappointing speedup is caused by a lot of spawning of printf (printf isn't a builtin in ash, right?) Setting

Re: improve demo-hardcode (e.g. on Solaris)

2005-04-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 03:43:32PM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Several people (I Cc:ed a couple) have reported spurious failures of demo-hardcode.test on some Solaris boxen. I believe they are all bogus and caused by the compiler or putting the command

Photoshop CS 8.0 $59.95 Win XP

2005-04-05 Thread Fran Daugherty
Title: 1568115 Browse Search Shop My eSoft Community Back to Software Overview Home All Categories Computers Software Operating Systems Windows