Re: FYI: TODO update

2005-04-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 06:36:38PM CEST: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >Nice way of saying "we need a bug tracking system". :-))) > > As far as I am aware libtool already has a working bug tracking system > at Savannaha. It may just be that libtool

Re: Win32 libltdl issue

2005-04-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Howard, * Howard Chu wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 02:40:45PM CEST: > The definition of LT_SCOPE in libltdl/ltdl.h needs a tweak; if some > other DLL (e.g. module 'foo') uses libltdl then it needs to define > LIBLTDL_DLL_IMPORT. Since 'foo' is compiled as a DLL, DLL_EXPORT will > already be

Re: FYI: TODO update

2005-04-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Howard, * Howard Chu wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 06:40:19PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 05:07:31PM CEST: > > > >Nice way of saying "we need a bug tracking system". :-))) > > The OpenLDAP Project uses jitterbugs, which is pretty braindead

FYI: TODO update

2005-04-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 05:07:31PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * TODO: Updated. > > Looks good to me. If you have time to put list archive reference links in to > the items that correspond with bug reports, that would be even better! Applied. Regards, Ralf

Re: FYI: TODO update

2005-04-26 Thread Howard Chu
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 05:07:31PM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * TODO: Updated. Looks good to me. If you have time to put list archive reference links in to the items that correspond with bug reports, that would be even better! Nice way of s

Re: FYI: TODO update

2005-04-26 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 05:07:31PM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * TODO: Updated. Looks good to me. If you have time to put list archive reference links in to the items that correspond with bug reports, that would be even

Re: FYI: TODO update

2005-04-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 05:07:31PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * TODO: Updated. > > Looks good to me. If you have time to put list archive reference links in to > the items that correspond with bug reports, that would be even better! Nice way of saying "we

Re: support standalone libltdl [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-23]

2005-04-26 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf! Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:13:17PM CEST: > > That done, a backport to branch-2-0 will require reverting to running > > libltdl/configure as a subconfigure, otherwise we can't release it > > bootstrapped with autoconf-2.59 and automake-1.

Re: FYI: TODO update

2005-04-26 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * TODO: Updated. Looks good to me. If you have time to put list archive reference links in to the items that correspond with bug reports, that would be even better! Cheers, Gary. -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org} Rese

FYI: TODO update

2005-04-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
TODO update for HEAD. Most of this applies to one or both other branches as well, though. Actually, concerning `$' in object file names: I believe there are only one or two buggy lines left. Will enable as soon as I have a corresponding test done. :) Some of the other item should also be rathe

Re: support standalone libltdl [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-23]

2005-04-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 04:15:37PM CEST: > * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:13:17PM CEST: > > > If we decide to do that, then it might ease our maintenance burden to > > backport this patch more or less as is (without a subconfigure > > hack)... the whole

Re: support standalone libltdl [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-23]

2005-04-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:13:17PM CEST: > > This changeset requires autoconf and automake patched according to: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2005-04/msg00028.html > > But I think it is fine for HEAD to rely on CVS autoconf/automake,

support standalone libltdl [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-23]

2005-04-26 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This changeset requires autoconf and automake patched according to: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2005-04/msg00028.html But I think it is fine for HEAD to rely on CVS autoconf/automake, although I don't want to commit until the

You're Billing Information

2005-04-26 Thread Paypal Online
Title: PayPal You're Billing Information! Dear PayPal Member, It has come to our attention that your PayPal Billing Information records are out of date. That r

Win32 libltdl issue

2005-04-26 Thread Howard Chu
The definition of LT_SCOPE in libltdl/ltdl.h needs a tweak; if some other DLL (e.g. module 'foo') uses libltdl then it needs to define LIBLTDL_DLL_IMPORT. Since 'foo' is compiled as a DLL, DLL_EXPORT will already be automatically defined, resulting in LT_SCOPE getting defined twice. A quick sol

FYI: HACKING update

2005-04-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Gary, others, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:24:17AM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > +* Make sure your locale is sane, e.g. by exporting LC_ALL=C. > > Good point! Hehe. Luckily I stumbled over the german navigation bar in the texinfo output before it was too late. :-)

Re: HACKING update

2005-04-26 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > +* Make sure your locale is sane, e.g. by exporting LC_ALL=C. Good point! > +* Check for interface changes in public m4 files and update serial > accordingly. Double check that serial number updates weren't forgotten since last release (they should be updated in CVS alo