Re: support standalone libltdl [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-23]

2005-08-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:28:59AM CEST: On 21 Aug 2005, at 08:21, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: No need to start working on that yet, this patch has several issues that make it unsuitable for application. Okay, addressed below and attached new version of the

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:51:50PM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | I backed out this patch. It was obviously broken, and I need at least a | bit of time to investigate (and do not want bogus bug reports because of | this patch causing havoc on !darwin). For

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-22 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: + # Convert -framework foo to foo.ltframework + if test -n $inherited_linker_flags; then + tmp_inherited_linker_flags=`$ECHO X$inherited_linker_flags | $Xsed -e 's/-framework \([[^ $]]*\)/\1.ltframework/g'` + for tmp_inherited_linker_flag in

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-22 Thread Christoph Egger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | I backed out this patch. It was obviously broken, and I need at least | a bit of time to investigate (and do not want bogus bug reports | because of this patch causing havoc on !darwin). For one, a `$' was |

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-22 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | I backed out this patch. It was obviously broken, and I need at least a | bit of time to investigate (and do not want bogus bug reports because of | this patch causing havoc on !darwin). For one, a `$' was missing |

Re: Libtool: Microsoft dumpbin as name lister

2005-08-22 Thread Tim Van Holder
Regarding dumpbin not being present in the 2003 version, I *think* it's just missing from the free toolkit and that it is still going strong in the real releases of Visual Studio. OK. I just can't test it then. Also, there seem to be third-party programs named `dumpbin'. Does your1 test av

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 04:04:17PM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: + * tmp_inherited_linker_flag *) ;; ^ Shouldn't there be a `$' here? This was what my hint was about. Of course there should. The whole attempt to remove duplicates will fail

RE: Libtool: Microsoft dumpbin as name lister

2005-08-22 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Peter Ekberg wrote: I wasn't intending to offend anyone with that remark, sorry if I did. Regarding my work being important, I can just say that I don't think so myself, I'm just doing it to see if it's possible and to Your work is clearly important. There is some code

branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD (was: Libtool: Microsoft dumpbin as name lister)

2005-08-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Ekberg wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 02:10:14PM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Peter Ekberg wrote on Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:36:47PM CEST: | +lt_cv_sys_global_symbol_pipe=$SED -n -e '/ UNDEF [^|]*()/d; / 00* UNDEF /d; I think you are missing a pair of brackets

Re: support standalone libltdl [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-23]

2005-08-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 06:26:23PM CEST: Ah, yes. I see what you mean now. Unfortunately, I don't think your patch will always work -- because of timestamp dependencies between $prefix/share/aclocal, $prefix/share/libtool/libltdl,

Re: support standalone libltdl [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-23]

2005-08-22 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: I'm not sure libtoolize should be changed. While Bob and I agreed that it was a good idea to have libtoolize update timestamps, this bears a problem: On my machine, several of the above files are installed the same second. So, on the client machine

Re: support standalone libltdl [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-23]

2005-08-22 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Noah Misch wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 07:25:00PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: On my machine, several of the above files are installed the same second. So, on the client machine where libtoolize is executed, they will have the same time. If libtoolize were to update time stamps, then it

Re: support standalone libltdl [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-23]

2005-08-22 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Another regression: on GNU/Linux, after bootstrap, configure, make: make[2]: *** No rule to make target `dlopen.la', needed by `libltdl/libltdl.la'. Stop. ltdl.m4 needs to be adjusted for this, I guess. I also guess this change will need adjustments in all

Re: support standalone libltdl [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-23]

2005-08-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:17:50PM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Another regression: on GNU/Linux, after bootstrap, configure, make: make[2]: *** No rule to make target `dlopen.la', needed by `libltdl/libltdl.la'. Stop. I can't reproduce this using either

Re: support standalone libltdl [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-23]

2005-08-22 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf! On 22 Aug 2005, at 21:04, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:17:50PM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Another regression: on GNU/Linux, after bootstrap, configure, make: make[2]: *** No rule to make target `dlopen.la', needed by

Re: support standalone libltdl [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-23]

2005-08-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:28:25PM CEST: Please compare your tree with my distcheck generated tarball from: http://tkd.kicks-ass.net/dist/libtool-2.1a.tar.gz I don't see any code generating this. *snip* ltdl.m4: ... # LTDL_INIT([DIRECTORY]) #

RE: Libtool: Microsoft dumpbin as name lister

2005-08-22 Thread Peter Ekberg
Tim Van Holder wrote: Regarding dumpbin not being present in the 2003 version, I *think* it's just missing from the free toolkit and that it is still going strong in the real releases of Visual Studio. OK. I just can't test it then. Also, there seem to be third-party programs named