RE: Libtool stresstest.at segfault on Cygwin/MinGW

2005-09-19 Thread Peter Ekberg
* Peter Ekberg wrote on Friday, September 16, 2005 11:11 CEST: > * Peter Ekberg wrote on Thursday, September 15, 2005 15:15 CEST: It's me again... > > * Peter Ekberg wrote on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:55 CEST: *snip* > > It didn't go away with gcc 3.4.4 so it looks like something > > diffe

Re: Libtool stresstest.at segfault on Cygwin/MinGW

2005-09-19 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Ekberg wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:11:23PM CEST: > * Peter Ekberg wrote on Friday, September 16, 2005 11:11 CEST: > > > > In short, when you specify the symbols to export with > > "-export-symbols foo.sym", the file foo.sym is simply prepended > > with an EXPORTS line (if m

RE: Libtool stresstest.at segfault on Cygwin/MinGW

2005-09-19 Thread Peter Ekberg
Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Monday, September 19, 2005 15:19 CEST: > Hi Peter, Hi! > * Peter Ekberg wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:11:23PM CEST: > > * Peter Ekberg wrote on Friday, September 16, 2005 11:11 CEST: > > > > > > In short, when you specify the symbols to export with > > > "-export-symb

Re: Libtool stresstest.at segfault on Cygwin/MinGW

2005-09-19 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Ekberg wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:17:56PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Monday, September 19, 2005 15:19 CEST: > > * Peter Ekberg wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:11:23PM CEST: > > > > > > And here's a patch to fix it. It doesn't work 100% on MinGW as > > > MinGW seems

Re: Libtool stresstest: echo marker with loop variables

2005-09-19 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Ekberg wrote on Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:31:58AM CEST: > > I can see that you are on top of all of my "complaints" on > stresstest.at. I will continue with a locally patched version > and will leave it up to you to improve it, the m4 magic and > autotest stuff is beyond me, reall

RE: Libtool stresstest.at segfault on Cygwin/MinGW

2005-09-19 Thread Peter Ekberg
Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Monday, September 19, 2005 17:10 CEST > * Peter Ekberg wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:17:56PM CEST: *snip* > > Well, the test segfaults on MinGW with the patch, and if I add > > DATA to all symbols manually in asyms the (reordered) test goes > > on until the same proble

RE: Libtool stresstest.at segfault on Cygwin/MinGW

2005-09-19 Thread Peter Ekberg
* Peter Ekberg wrote on Monday, September 19, 2005 21:05 CEST It's me again... > Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Monday, September 19, 2005 17:10 CEST > > * Peter Ekberg wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:17:56PM CEST: > > *snip* > > > > Well, the test segfaults on MinGW with the patch, and if I add > >

RE: Libtool stresstest.at segfault on Cygwin/MinGW

2005-09-19 Thread Peter Ekberg
* Peter Ekberg wrote on Tuesday, September 20, 2005 00:09 CEST It's me again... > * Peter Ekberg wrote on Monday, September 19, 2005 21:05 CEST > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Monday, September 19, 2005 17:10 CEST > > > * Peter Ekberg wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:17:56PM CEST: > > > > *snip* >

RE: Libtool stresstest.at segfault on Cygwin/MinGW

2005-09-19 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Peter Ekberg wrote: I spoke too soon. I forgot that I had disabled the `pwd`/ part of the rel loop. That still fails since MSYS does not convert a -Wl,--out-implib,/c/absolute/path argument to -Wl,--out-implib,C:/absolute/path But that is a MinGW bug in my book. Why would ld