Re: ltdl sillyness

2005-10-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:17:20PM CEST: Hacky test, exposes on systems where LTDL_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS is defined: sed 's,foo1,foo2' foo1.la foo2.la Erm: 's,foo1,foo2,g'. ./mdemo ./foo2.la # file not found error ./mdemo foo2.la # assertion Sorry

HEAD: LT_PATH_NM fix (was: libtool-HEAD, 20051007, cygwin)

2005-10-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ from a thread on the libtool list ] * Charles Wilson wrote on Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:06:14AM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Please post tests/testsuite.log containing the failures (packed?). I cannot reproduce this on GNU/Linux (and you posting should be less work than me trying to

Re: [patch 04/19] 286-gary-libtoolize-recursive-ltdl.diff Queue

2005-10-13 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf, Thanks for the review! Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Very nice patch! But it mixes up two things, and at that quite heavily: Do you want the (non)recursive/subproject info as argument to LT_WITH_LTDL or LT_CONFIG_LTDL_DIR or possibly both? Please redo `libtoolize' output based on