FYI: SCO/bugfix patch 8 of 10: ltmain.in -L handling for SCO platforms

Hi Tim, * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 11:07:10PM CET: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > Ah-ha! So the linker thinks these are two different libraries, and adds > > two DT_NEEDED entries. How stupid. Now we need to find out whether > > this affects the dynamic load

Re: SCO/bugfix patch 8 of 10: ltmain.in -L handling for SCO platforms

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Tim, > > * Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 11:41:39PM CET: > > ... > > $ dump -Lv .libs/depdemo > > > > libs/depdemo: > > > > DYNAMIC SECTION INFORMATION > > dynamic : > > [INDEX] Tag Value > > [1] NEEDED libl1.so.0 >

Re: Fix libtool on HP-UX/IA-64

Hi Albert, * Albert Chin wrote on Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 01:27:03AM CET: > On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 08:34:23AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Albert Chin wrote on Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 06:15:49PM CET: > > > The following patch fixes libtool-1.5 on HP-UX 11.23/IA-64. > > > 1. If you specify +b a

Re: SCO/bugfix patch 8 of 10: ltmain.in -L handling for SCO platforms

Hi Tim, * Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 11:41:39PM CET: > ... > $ dump -Lv .libs/depdemo > > libs/depdemo: > > DYNAMIC SECTION INFORMATION > dynamic : > [INDEX] Tag Value > [1] NEEDED libl1.so.0 > [2] NEEDED libl2.so.0 > [3] NEEDED libl4.so.0 > [4] N

Re: (non)recursive mode fixups

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Gary, Hallo Ralf! nonrecursive mode is cool. Thanks for all your commits! NP. Thanks for all your reviews! :-D It has a few warts, though, but also another cool thing can be fixed now. First the good thing: in principle, libltdl can do fine without an AC_CONFI

FYI: refactor autotests [299]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Applied to HEAD. * looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-363 to compare with * comparing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-363 M tests/old-m4-iface.at M ChangeLog M tests/standalone.at M tests/testsuite.a

(non)recursive mode fixups

Hi Gary, nonrecursive mode is cool. Thanks for all your commits! It has a few warts, though, but also another cool thing can be fixed now. First the good thing: in principle, libltdl can do fine without an AC_CONFIG_HEADER at all: --- libltdl/Makefile.inc2005-10-26 12:42:05.0 +

FYI: document libltdl build modes [298]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Applied to HEAD. * looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-362 to compare with * comparing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-362 M doc/libtool.texi M ChangeLog * modified files Index: Changelog from

FYI: LT_WITH_LTDL recursive [297]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Applied to HEAD. * looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-361 to compare with * comparing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-361 M libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4 M ChangeLog * modified files Index: Changelog from

FYI: ltdl recursive tests [296]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Applied to HEAD. * looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-360 to compare with * comparing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-360 A tests/.arch-ids/recursive.at.id A tests/recursive.at M Makefile.am M Change

FYI: don't force ac_config_headers on subproject ltdl [295]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Applied to HEAD. * looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-359 to compare with * comparing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-359 M libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4 M tests/old-m4-iface.at M ChangeLog M tests/subproject.a

FYI: LT_WITH_LTDL nonrecursive [289]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Applied to HEAD. * looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-358 to compare with * comparing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-358 M configure.ac M libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4 M ChangeLog * modified files Index