Re: distchecking without FC?

2007-06-21 Thread Noah Misch
Hi Ralf, On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 09:52:40PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Noah Misch wrote on Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 09:36:06PM CEST: > > The current code gets that right, at least. > > Well, this is an argument for showing your latest version of > tests/f{c,77}demo/configure.ac changes to beco

Re: distchecking without FC?

2007-06-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Noah, Benoit, * Noah Misch wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 03:54:14PM CEST: > > Here's the current version of that patch. It allows `make dist' to > work on a system with no F77/F90 compilers. Suitable? Yes, please apply. It would be nice if Benoit could confirm that it works for him as well

Re: distchecking without FC?

2007-06-21 Thread Benoit Sigoure
Quoting Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Noah, Benoit, * Noah Misch wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 03:54:14PM CEST: Here's the current version of that patch. It allows `make dist' to work on a system with no F77/F90 compilers. Suitable? Yes, please apply. It would be nice if Benoit

Re: distchecking without FC?

2007-06-21 Thread Noah Misch
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 07:06:01PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Yes, please apply. It would be nice if Benoit could confirm that it > works for him as well, and nice of you to mention him as bug reporter > in the ChangeLog entry. :-) Done. Thanks for the reviews and testing.

-version-number on irix

2007-06-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, When lbuilding libpng-1.2.18 on Irix, we ran across this gem: libtool: link: AGE `18' is greater than the current interface number `17' libtool: link: `0:18:0' is not valid version information This is because libpng has '-version-number 0:18:0' - they really want a .18. in their library name..

Re: -version-number on irix

2007-06-21 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Peter O'Gorman wrote: When -version-number was added, the major number was decremented as it would later be incremented, however, when major is 0, it fails as above. This patch does not decrement, and, if -version-number does not increment later, thus avoiding the test. Th

Re: -version-number on irix

2007-06-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:09 -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > > When -version-number was added, the major number was decremented as it > > would later be incremented, however, when major is 0, it fails as above. > > This patch does not decrement, and, i