Add missing parentheses in the manual.

2009-02-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
I noted a missing parenthesis in the manual, and checked for more. Pushed as obvious. Cheers, Ralf * doc/libtool.texi (Distributing libltdl, Test descriptions): Add missing parentheses. diff --git a/doc/libtool.texi b/doc/libtool.texi index 0b35500..2f90ca3 100644 --- a/doc/libtool.texi

Re: [PATCH] Make compilation of preloaded module glue -Wstrict-prototypes clean

2009-02-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Lennart, all, * Lennart Poettering wrote on Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 04:10:37AM CET: > When generating the glue code for preloaded modules libtool produces > invalid prototypes without argument lists. When compiling with > slightly fascist compiler options (-Wstrict-prototypes) this has the > ef

Re: cmdline_wrap.at

2009-02-28 Thread Tim Rice
Hi Ralf, On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: [snip] > Is this an optimization only, or a necessary thing? IOW, if I omit > libfoo-1.0 in this "CC -Tprelink_objects" line, would that only > pessimize link time, or could it affect the link result? I'll let John answer this > Anyway, I t

Document INNER_TESTSUITEFLAGS, drop leading space

2009-02-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello, I found this very helpful while debugging the template test inside the low max_cmd_len test. Any reasons against applying it? Thanks, Ralf 2009-02-28 Ralf Wildenhues Document INNER_TESTSUITEFLAGS, drop leading space. * README: Document INNER_TESTSUITEFLAGS. *

Re: cmdline_wrap.at

2009-02-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello John, Tim, * John Wolfe wrote on Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 07:38:41PM CET: > Happy to contribute where I can. Sorry to not get back to you sooner: > I actually spent an evening away from the computer. No problem at all of course. [ snip explanations ] > All that is probably more than you want

Re: cmdline_wrap.at

2009-02-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Tim, * Tim Rice wrote on Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 01:50:27AM CET: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > : * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:47:49PM CET: > : > > : > Sure, attched as x.tst-without-patch & x.tst-with-patch > : > I've also attached the curent patch I'm using as

Re: Bug#517501: libtool: uninitialized shell variable causes link failure when run under zsh

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 14:29, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > tags fixed-upstream > thanks > > [ adding libtool-patches; see ] > > OK, here's the deal: 'emulate sh' turns off the special properties of > the $path array, but keeps its first entry: > > $ zsh -c 'echo $path.; emulate s

Re: Bug#517501: libtool: uninitialized shell variable causes link failure when run under zsh

2009-02-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Török Edwin wrote on Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 01:49:27PM CET: > Is there a release date planned for next libtool release? No. Well, maybe yes, but isn't there an empirical law like "publishing the next planned release date will double the chance of it being missed"? ;-) > I would like to know if

Re: Bug#517501: libtool: uninitialized shell variable causes link failure when run under zsh

2009-02-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
tags fixed-upstream thanks [ adding libtool-patches; see ] OK, here's the deal: 'emulate sh' turns off the special properties of the $path array, but keeps its first entry: $ zsh -c 'echo $path.; emulate sh; echo $path.' /usr/local/bin /usr/bin /bin /usr/bin/X11 /

Re: bootstrap: CVS is history

2009-02-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Andreas, * Andreas Schwab wrote on Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:44:41PM CET: > The libtool repository no longer uses CVS. > 2009-02-18 Andreas Schwab > > * bootstrap: Remove references to CVS. > Thanks for the patch. I went through the tree and removed remaining references, resultin