Hello Tim, John,
* John Wolfe wrote on Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:11:34AM CET:
>>>
>>> - In the patch, I think the "$CC -r" should be "$LD -r"
Yep, stupid bug. I've pushed the patch, but changed that particular
hunk to this.
Cheers, and thanks for testing,
Ralf
@@ -6221,6 +6223,8 @@ if test "$
That is good to hear.I had cleaned up my build/test areas before
leaving the office at the
end of the week.
I was in the process of checking out everything from our CVS repository;
it takes at
little while from home. My plan was to integrate Ralf's patch into the
2.2.6 libtool with
an L
[ droping libtool@ from replies ]
Hi John, Ralf
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, John Wolfe wrote:
> Hi Ralf, Tim
>
> Here I am playing catch up again.
>
> At first look at the patch I have one concern and that may be what is
> contributing to
> the failures later reported in this thread.
>
> - In the pa
Hi Ralf, Tim
Here I am playing catch up again.
At first look at the patch I have one concern and that may be what is
contributing to
the failures later reported in this thread.
- In the patch, I think the "$CC -r" should be "$LD -r"
Using the C++ compiler command to do the linking does
