Hi Gary,
Den 2010-06-22 14:53 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
In this case, Peter, would you point me at the followup patches that need
this preliminary prep work? I had a poke around in your git branch but
couldn't (quickly) figure out where this is going... and without that it's
hard to do a sane revie
I forgot to commit the following chunk before extracting the
patch from git:
diff --git a/libltdl/config/getopt.m4sh b/libltdl/config/getopt.m4sh
index 1487755..76f9d35 100644
--- a/libltdl/config/getopt.m4sh
+++ b/libltdl/config/getopt.m4sh
@@ -49,6 +49,13 @@ m4_pattern_forbid([^_?m4go_])
## 1.
Hallo Ralf, Peter,
On 23 Jun 2010, at 03:16, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 03:07:30PM CEST:
>> Den 2010-06-22 13:54 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
>>> But compile_tag is never set, so the patch is a NOP!
>
>>> If this has to be fudged into the libtool tag settings b
* Charles Wilson wrote on Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 06:17:41AM CEST:
> On 6/20/2010 1:33 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > This can go. Please mention in the comment that not using a common lib
> > represents an ODR violation (mentioning relevant terms from standards is
> > helpful).
> >
> > BTW, does no
On 6/20/2010 1:33 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Charles Wilson wrote on Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 06:59:02AM CEST:
>> There are ODR issues with the definition of the exception class(es).
>> While on linux, the code may technically be in violation, in practice
>> it is ok and works.
>
> But that's not
This is the improved (and renamed) `Use getopt.m4sh to generate libtool
option parser.' patch I promised yesterday. I'm pretty happy with this,
save that even though _LT_PROG_XSI_REPLACE correctly generates sed
scripts in config.status of the form:
sed -i .tmp -e '/^func_name ()$/,/^} # func_na
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 03:07:30PM CEST:
> Den 2010-06-22 13:54 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
> >But compile_tag is never set, so the patch is a NOP!
> >If this has to be fudged into the libtool tag settings by hand to
> >support MSVC (or some other nefarious means I'm miss
Hi Chuck,On 22 Jun 2010, at 19:10, Charles Wilson wrote:On 6/22/2010 7:54 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:But compile_tag is never set, so the patch is a NOP!If that happens with a later patch in your series, please roll allthe compile_tag machinery into a single commit.But what if that later patch, in o
Hi Gary,
Den 2010-06-22 13:54 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
But compile_tag is never set, so the patch is a NOP!
If that happens with a later patch in your series, please roll all
the compile_tag machinery into a single commit.
If this has to be fudged into the libtool tag settings by hand to
support
On 6/22/2010 7:54 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> But compile_tag is never set, so the patch is a NOP!
>
> If that happens with a later patch in your series, please roll all
> the compile_tag machinery into a single commit.
But what if that later patch, in order to work correctly, also requires
addi
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your continued work on this.
On 22 Jun 2010, at 16:35, Peter Rosin wrote:
> MSVC needs a hint to force it to compile either as C or C++.
> * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4: Add tag variable compile_tag to
> enable tag specific compiler options that are bad in the
>
Ooops, exported the wrong thing from git...
Sorry for the noise. Here's the intended patch
Cheers,
Peter
commit 1e1a3cb447ee0d725d6cd8249358d9d5595a039b
Author: Peter Rosin
Date: Tue Jun 22 11:07:22 2010 +0200
MSVC needs a hint to force it to compile either as C or C++.
* libltd
Next patch in the MSVC series...
This is
"MSVC needs a hint to force it to compile either as C or C++."
abfb96f4c44b3e38fcf960c876e17fc252e9712c
and the relevant part of
"patch msvc-documentation.patch"
06cfce005204bb8ca212aadab38b38c0202ea04e
with @var changed to @code
This was originally su
Hallo Ralf,
On 22 Jun 2010, at 12:48, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> On 12 Jun 2010, at 17:45, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:34:04PM CEST:
That's quite an invasive change, since the core of the M4SH_GETOPTS
generated code will then rely on the X
[working through my email backlog after being mostly offline for the
last week or more. Apologies if this is too late to be relevant.]
On 13 Jun 2010, at 12:07, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 06:07:44AM CEST:
>> On 06/11/2010 11:56 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrot
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 07:42:27AM CEST:
> On 22 Jun 2010, at 00:59, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > However, this makes me more cautious
> > about your other patch for using this machinery for the libtool script
> > itself: that is created in packages using Libtool,
>
> Not tru
On 22 Jun 2010, at 00:59, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Gary,
Hallo Ralf,
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 02:56:12PM CEST:
>> This fixes the FreeBSD bootstrap problem. Okay to push?
>
> Okay if it passes the testsuite.
Tx. Pushed.
[moved comments on my other patch back into t
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 07:42:27AM CEST:
> # First we set _m4go_xsi_shell if the standard shell supports XSI features
> # that allow us to avoid (expensive on Windows) forks:
BTW, the number of forks in libtool is even measureable for builds on
GNU/Linux. The list archive
Hallo Ralf,
[transplanted from another thread]
On 22 Jun 2010, at 00:59, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> However, this makes me more cautious
> about your other patch for using this machinery for the libtool script
> itself: that is created in packages using Libtool,
Not true. We distribute libtoolize
19 matches
Mail list logo
