Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-28-gadb7abd

2011-10-23 Thread Peter O'Gorman
One of these commits broke the daily snapshot. The machine does not yet have autobuild installed. Now that it's a hard bootstrap requirement, I will try to make time to install it. Peter On 10/23/2011 10:40 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-28-gadb7abd

2011-10-23 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On 10/23/2011 05:34 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: One of these commits broke the daily snapshot. The machine does not yet have autobuild installed. Now that it's a hard bootstrap requirement, I will try to make time to install it. Peter Heh, didn't see the patches emails because I hadn't read the

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-28-gadb7abd

2011-10-23 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011, Peter O'Gorman wrote: One of these commits broke the daily snapshot. The machine does not yet have autobuild installed. Now that it's a hard bootstrap requirement, I will try to make time to install it. It seems that there is also a problem if gnulib is not installed on

Re: bug#9845: [PATCH 1/3] maint: use gnulib's maint.mk and support scripts release procedure.

2011-10-23 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On 10/23/2011 11:03 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: All, By the end of this series, making a release still involves an awful lot of waiting, but after passing the bevy of make distcheck variations mandated in the README-release, is now a simple matter of: 1. libltdl/config/do-release-commit-and

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-28-gadb7abd

2011-10-23 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, On 24 Oct 2011, at 05:45, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > On 10/23/2011 05:34 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: >> One of these commits broke the daily snapshot. The machine does not yet >> have autobuild installed. Now that it's a hard bootstrap requirement, I >> will try to make time to install it. >>

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-28-gadb7abd

2011-10-23 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, On 24 Oct 2011, at 05:34, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > One of these commits broke the daily snapshot. The machine does not yet have > autobuild installed. Now that it's a hard bootstrap requirement, I will try > to make time to install it. If you can bootstrap and build successfully withou

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-28-gadb7abd

2011-10-23 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On 10/23/2011 08:24 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: My bad... I've been away from libtool development so long that I totally forgot to differentiate between bug-libtool and libtool-patches. Sorry about that. One day I'm going to have to read the documentation, so I can figure out how to close b

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-28-gadb7abd

2011-10-23 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On 10/23/2011 08:29 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Hi Peter, On 24 Oct 2011, at 05:34, Peter O'Gorman wrote: One of these commits broke the daily snapshot. The machine does not yet have autobuild installed. Now that it's a hard bootstrap requirement, I will try to make time to install it. If yo

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-28-gadb7abd

2011-10-23 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Bob, On 24 Oct 2011, at 06:34, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > It seems that there is also a problem if gnulib is not installed on the > machine because 'make check' ends up using a formally-installed gnulib .m4 > file rather than the one in the libtool source tree. I know this because I > don't h

Re: bug#9845: [PATCH 1/3] maint: use gnulib's maint.mk and support scripts release procedure.

2011-10-23 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, On 24 Oct 2011, at 08:22, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > On 10/23/2011 11:03 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> By the end of this series, making a release still involves an awful lot >> of waiting, but after passing the bevy of make distcheck variations >> mandated in the README-release, is now a s

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-28-gadb7abd

2011-10-23 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, On 24 Oct 2011, at 08:29, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > On 10/23/2011 08:24 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> >> My bad... I've been away from libtool development so long that I totally >> forgot to >> differentiate between bug-libtool and libtool-patches. Sorry about that. > > One day I'm goi

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-28-gadb7abd

2011-10-23 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, On 24 Oct 2011, at 09:13, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> One day I'm going to have to read the documentation, so I can figure out how >> to close bugs. >> >> http://debbugs.gnu.org/db/pa/llibtool.html > > I'm pretty sure you just reply to the thread with a one liner: > > close 12345 Bzz

Re: bug#9846: [PATCH 2/3] maint: use gnulib's git-version-gen instead of mkstamp.

2011-10-23 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
[[moving to the correct list]] Hi All, It turns out that this patch isn't quite complete, because we were also using mkstamp to count the number of datelines in our ChangeLogs to get a serial number for ltversion.m4. The appended patch counts the number of git commits in order to get a serial nu