Update of patch#10393 (group libtool):
Status:None => Done
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
I went ahead and mer
Update of patch#10411 (group libtool):
Status:None => Done
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
Thanks for finding t
Update of patch#10417 (group libtool):
Status:None => Done
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
Thank you for the pa
I looked over and applied both the patches and they work
for me. I was running into the same permissions issue.
--
Ileana Dumitrescu
GPG Public Key: FA26 CA78 4BE1 8892 7F22 B99F 6570 EA01 146F 7354
OpenPGP_0x6570EA01146F7354.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
On 20/01/2024 15:43, Mike Frysinger wrote:
* doc/libtool.texi: Fix some style & minor grammar.
---
doc/libtool.texi | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Thanks, I merged it in.
--
Ileana Dumitrescu
GPG Public Key: FA26 CA78 4BE1 8892 7F22 B99F 6570 EA01
nt
release and then merge it
-mike
I agree. I'm currently waiting on upload permissions to Savannah, so
that I can upload an alpha. If it takes too long to get permissions,
I'll consider going ahead and merging this in.
--
Ileana Dumitrescu
GPG Public Key: FA26 CA78 4BE1 8892 7F22 B99F
Update of patch#41 (group libtool):
Status:None => Wont Do
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #2:
The patch no longer see
Update of patch#9678 (group libtool):
Status:None => Done
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
Thanks for the patch!
Thank you for catching this! I have merged in the fix.
On 01/03/2024 11:39, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
Commit f54924fa5d8d5959038e58adab7c552c3ca495ae seems to have been
wrongly applied.
Regards.
--
O.S.
--
Ileana Dumitrescu
GPG Public Key: FA26 CA78 4BE1 8892 7F22 B99F 6570 EA01 146F 7354
t prog,link = "$linkmode,$pass"; then
compile_deplibs="$deplib $compile_deplibs"
finalize_deplibs="$deplib $finalize_deplibs"
--
Ileana Dumitrescu
GPG Public Key: FA26 CA78 4BE1 8892 7F22 B99F 6570 EA01 146F 7354
OpenPGP_0x6570EA01146F7354
:
Hello,
When building project, for example, with
CFLAGS=-Werror=strict-prototypes or similar, the libtool's
tests can cause false reports and errors in the log files:
error: function declaration isn't a prototype
The appended patch includes some fixes for such cases.
Thank you.
Follow-up Comment #3, patch #10393 (group libtool):
Thank you for the suggestion. Since we are already embedding rpath into
Android, we could take the next step and start using GNU/Linux versioning.
This would be contrary to the standard method of Android versioning, in which
shared libraries are
FILECMD], [file], [:])
+[AC_CHECK_PROG([FILECMD], [file], [file], [:])
_LT_DECL([], [FILECMD], [1], [A file(cmd) program that detects file types])
])# _LD_DECL_FILECMD
Thank you for the patch! It has been applied to the development branch.
--
Ileana Dumitrescu
GPG Public Key: FA26 CA78 4BE1 8892 7F22
Thank you for the details! I have merged in your patch to the
development branch, and you should see it in the next release
of libtool.
On 21/04/2024 21:19, Peter Kokot wrote:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 19:56, Ileana Dumitrescu
wrote:
Thank you for the patch. Diagnosing the test errors is not so
5,6 +2568,7 @@ cygwin* | mingw* | windows* | pw32* | cegcc*)
if test -n '\''$stripme'\'' && test -n '\''$striplib'\''; then
eval '\''$striplib \$dldir/$dlname'\'' || exit \$?;
fi'
+fi
postuninstall_cmds='dldll=`$SHELL 2>&1 -c '\''. $file; echo \$dlname'\''`~
dlpath=$dir/\$dldll~
$RM \$dlpath'
--
Ileana Dumitrescu
GPG Public Key: FA26 CA78 4BE1 8892 7F22 B99F 6570 EA01 146F 7354
OpenPGP_0x6570EA01146F7354.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Update of patch # (group libtool):
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #2:
Thank you for your patch! It has been merged in, and a test has been fixed
along with it :)
Follow-up Comment #4, patch # (group libtool):
I will remove the INN comment, but if I understand the "FIXME" correctly, it
should be kept as a reminder to rethink the logic of the code in this section.
It does not seem to be specific to the 'preserve-dup-deps' flag. Please tell
me if I am wro
Update of patch # (group libtool):
Status:None => Done
___
Follow-up Comment #6:
This has been updated in development, and thank you again for your patch!
https://git.savannah.g
suppression. If your patch is applied, the option to switch off
suppression should also be removed, but switching the logic around to
suppress if chosen seems like a better solution than complete removal.
However, you could also just specify '-no-suppress' when compiling
rather than chang
On 15/08/2024 20:37, Sam James wrote:
Nick Bowler writes:
On 2024-08-15 12:13, Sam James wrote:
Ileana Dumitrescu writes:
However, you could also just specify '-no-suppress' when compiling
rather than changing the default behaviour.
(Is there a way to do this globally? If I
On 15/08/2024 21:27, Nick Bowler wrote:
On 2024-08-15 14:13, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote:
Printing the differences on the second run seems like a better default,
while keeping the option for -no-suppress for the complete log. Maybe
adding an informational message about -no-suppress with the diff
Update of patch #10469 (group libtool):
Status:None => Done
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
Thank you for the p
22 matches
Mail list logo