On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 09:01:43PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > >> char *tmp_pathspec;
> > >> char *actual_cwrapper_path;
> > >> char *shwrapper_name;
> > >>+ intptr_t rval = 127;
> The above breaks on my MinGW install, which is definitely later than
> 2000. I need to #include to get it.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 07:06:01PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Yes, please apply. It would be nice if Benoit could confirm that it
> works for him as well, and nice of you to mention him as bug reporter
> in the ChangeLog entry. :-)
Done. Thanks for the reviews and testing.
Hi Ralf,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 09:52:40PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Noah Misch wrote on Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 09:36:06PM CEST:
> > The current code gets that right, at least.
>
> Well, this is an argument for showing your latest version of
> tests/f{c,77}demo/confi
Hi Ralf,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 08:38:49PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Noah Misch wrote on Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 07:43:52AM CEST:
> > I gave this a whirl. Having done so, I personally prefer the
> > simplicity of the literal patch. What do you think?
>
> FWIW
Hi Ralf,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 11:13:36AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Noah Misch wrote on Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:42:04AM CEST:
> > If better, we could compromise between complexity
> > and redundancy by generating the list of files at `bootstrap' time.
>
> If
Hi Ralf,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 11:13:36AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Noah Misch wrote on Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:42:04AM CEST:
> > Therefore, I took a different approach:
> > list the files to distribute directly in the top-level Makefile.am,
> > and do not bother
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:50:41PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Noah Misch wrote:
> >
> >`make dist' now works fine on a system with no Fortran. The list of files
> >in
> >the distribution has not changed.
> Normally I would be more
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 09:02:39AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:52:45PM +0200, Benoit Sigoure wrote:
> > Quoting Noah Misch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:47:12PM +0200, Benoit Sigoure wrote:
> > >>is there any reas
Hi Charles,
Overall, the patch looks suitable. Some minor comments:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 02:23:58PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> 2007-04-22 Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_ltwrapper_script_p):
> new function detects if $1 is a libtool
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:52:45PM +0200, Benoit Sigoure wrote:
> Quoting Noah Misch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:47:12PM +0200, Benoit Sigoure wrote:
> >>is there any reason why I can checkout, configure and make all check
> >>libtool HEAD
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:47:12PM +0200, Benoit Sigoure wrote:
> is there any reason why I can checkout, configure and make all check
> libtool HEAD but not distcheck it? Configure would complain (only
> during distcheck) that I don't have a working Fortran compiler.
I posted a patch to fix
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 01:11:17PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>if ((stat (path, &st) >= 0) && (
> -/* MinGW & native WIN32 do not support
> S_IXOTH or S_IXGRP */
> -#if defined (S_IXOTH)
> -((st.st_mode & S_IXOTH) == S_IXOTH) ||
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 10:56:22AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Noah Misch wrote:
> >Long-term, we can revise this cumbersome division of work between the
> >executable
> >wrapper and the wrapper script. Ideally, the wrapper methodology for Unix
> >should resemble
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:20:05PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2007 11:27:08 -0400, "Charles Wilson" said:
> > On May 4, 2007, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2007-04/msg00088.html
> Ping * 3.
I don't speak for the Libtool maintainer
/Linux, but it now skips on Mac OS 10.1. It
should now skip rather than pass on AIX.
2007-05-04 Noah Misch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* tests/duplicate_deps.at: Make the XFAIL unconditional, but skip the
test if the test link would succeed even without --preserve-dup-deps.
diff
quot;$@"}'. This
patches func_echo to avoid the problem, fixing quote.test on Mac OS X 10.1.
2007-05-04 Noah Misch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* libltdl/config/general.m4sh (func_echo): Use $* instead of ${1+"$@"}.
diff -urpX dontdiff lt-bootstrap/libltdl/config/general
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 08:51:06AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Noah Misch wrote on Fri, May 04, 2007 at 03:52:24AM CEST:
> > `make dist' needs every test demo directory configured. If the system has
> > no
> > F90 compiler, tests/fcdemo/configure always
r the sake of `make dist'.
2007-05-03 Noah Misch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* tests/fcdemo/configure.ac : New option. Skip call to
AC_FC_SRCEXT when specified.
* Makefile.am (@DIST_MAKEFILE_LIST@): Pass --with-dist.
diff -urpX dontdiff lt-bootstrap/Makefile.am lt-fc
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:36:34PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> names. With `join', this issue could easily be fixed, but it's not
> available on mingw (and not in the list of allowed tools). :-/
Given that MSYS is ``a Minimal SYStem, with which a configure script could be
executed,''[1] its
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 09:45:20AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 08:20:28AM CEST:
> > * Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:10:53AM CEST:
> >
> > > Also, now that I think about it I prefer "#if HAVE_CONFIG_H" to
> > > "#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:30:35PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> * libltdl/m4/options.m4 (_LT_WITH_PIC): Renamed...
> (_LT_ENABLE_PIC): ...this. Adjust all callers. The configure
> option is now `--enable-pic', since `--with-pic' implies that the
> user wants to compile
Hi Ralf,
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 10:38:46AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Noah Misch wrote on Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 03:46:51AM CEST:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:54:06PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > * Noah Misch wrote on Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:42:34PM CEST:
>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:54:06PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Noah Misch wrote on Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:42:34PM CEST:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 08:41:12AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > > There's one thing I still don't understand: before, we
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:01:29PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER)
> (_LT_LINKER_SHLIBS): Double-quote unsafe tag variable
> descriptions: they are literals.
This is reasonable. The central problem is _LT_LIBTOOL_DECLARE exp
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 08:41:12AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Noah Misch wrote on Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:28:35AM CEST:
> > I wrote a goofy fix for this shortly after Gary and I finalized the current
> > implementation. The problem seemed minor, so I did not contribute
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:51:24PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> On AIX, when libtool generates a symbol list, it wrongly outputs this:
>
> | /usr/bin/nm -B -BCpg .libs/hello.o .libs/foo.o | awk '{ if (((exit $? ==
> "T") || (exit $? == "D") || (exit $? == "B")) && (substr(,1,1) != ".")) {
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:00:01PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Noah Misch wrote:
> >Would adding AM_MAINTAINER_MODE to the libltdl `configure.ac' usefully help
> >shield users from these time stamp problems?
>
> Yes I think it would. The question then is: is it okay
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 07:25:00PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> On my machine, several of the above files are installed the same second.
> So, on the client machine where libtoolize is executed, they will have
> the same time. If libtoolize were to update time stamps, then it would
> need to kn
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:53:14PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Peter Ekberg wrote on Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 09:37:47AM CEST:
> > Apart from a bunch of shared lib description variables,
> > I have also made a dirty change. Without it C++ fails
> > miserably for MSVC. cl.exe only detects .cpp an
Hi Ralf,
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:18:48AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > This is not ok: $ECHO may only take one argument, so you must
What systems have that problem? What do they do with the latter arguments?
> > > double-quote. Furthermore, the argument may
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 03:30:39PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I would like to run the Autotest testsuite of Libtool HEAD on systems
> which do not have all AT_TESTED() programs available, or possibly under
> a different name.
>
> Right now, the testsuite fails when it there is at least one pr
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 05:32:05PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I don't know if it's worthwhile to support FreeBSD make..
>
> I have no idea how to keep it from looping without this patch, after
> running the rules for vcl-tmp it always seems to want to update
> stamp-vcl .. seems like timestam
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 10:34:19AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>## with libtoolize, we have to preserve their timestamps carefully:
>install-data-local:
> $(mkinstalldirs) $(DESTDIR)$(ltdldatadir)
> - ( cd $(srcdir) && $(AMTAR) cf - $(ltdldatafiles); ) \
> + ( cd $(srcdir) &
33 matches
Mail list logo
