Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2006-08-27 Thread Pierre Ossman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > First I never got around to testing GnuWin32 `file' right away, > and then your patch got lost. :-( > > Please accept my apologies. I have applied it as follows. > No sweat. I know you have a lot on your table. And better late than never. ;) -- Pierre Ossman

Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2006-08-25 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Pierre, * Pierre Ossman wrote on Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 04:14:11PM CEST: > Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >> OK to apply this patch? > > > > Yes please! > > > >> * libtool.m4 (AC_DEPLIBS_CHECK_METHOD) [ mingw, pw32 ]: > >> If `file' is present, use `func_

Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2006-08-25 Thread Keith MARSHALL
Hi Ralf, Ralf Wildenhues wrote, quoting me: >> While it is true that MSYS/MinGW doesn't include a `file' command as >> standard, it is perfectly feasible to use a `foreign' implementation >> with MSYS; e.g. I have installed the GnuWin32 v4.16 implementation >> http://sourceforge.net/project/show

Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2006-08-25 Thread Earnie Boyd
Quoting Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello Keith, This is a somewhat older thread: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2005-12/msg00102.html with an (unfortunately; sorry!) still-pending issue: * Keith MARSHALL wrote on Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 06:17:57PM CET: Ralf Wildenhue

Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2006-08-25 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Keith, This is a somewhat older thread: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2005-12/msg00102.html with an (unfortunately; sorry!) still-pending issue: * Keith MARSHALL wrote on Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 06:17:57PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote, quoting Bob Frieshahn: > >> Since ther

Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2006-08-22 Thread Pierre Ossman
Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> OK to apply this patch? > > Yes please! > >> * libtool.m4 (AC_DEPLIBS_CHECK_METHOD) [ mingw, pw32 ]: >> If `file' is present, use `func_win32_libid' rather than >> `objdump -f', to facilitate cross-compilation. >>

Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2005-12-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Keith, * Keith MARSHALL wrote on Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 11:17:08AM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=13069136 which > > If I interpret that correctly, you are specifically asking for `join' > and `paste', from GNU coreutils; you would also l

Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2005-12-23 Thread Keith MARSHALL
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > While you're already considering adding tools to improve libtool > support, may I kindly point to > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=13069136 which > has not been addressed yet, as far as I can see. It would help us > very much to convince to change th

Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2005-12-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Keith MARSHALL wrote on Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 06:17:57PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote, quoting Bob Frieshahn: > > > > OK, so the only remaining case really is MSYS/MinGW itself. Do we > > know of win32 installations that provide a `file' command that does > > not do what we expect? > > While it

Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2005-12-22 Thread Keith MARSHALL
Ralf Wildenhues wrote, quoting Bob Frieshahn: >> Since there is no standard 'file' command provided with MSYS/MinGW, >> is this safe? > > OK, so the only remaining case really is MSYS/MinGW itself. Do we > know of win32 installations that provide a `file' command that does > not do what we expect?

Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2005-12-21 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: OK, so the only remaining case really is MSYS/MinGW itself. Do we know of win32 installations that provide a `file' command that does not do what we expect? Note that not having `file' available would be fine here, but one that does something complet

Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2005-12-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ adding subscribers-only mingw-users back -- they may have useful input on this ] Hi Bob, * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 06:46:21PM CET: On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >Question to libtool folks: OK to apply this patch? There are other reasons not to find t

Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2005-12-19 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Alternatively, just to try whether this works at all, you could edit the libtool script directly and change deplibs_check_method="file_magic ^x86 archive import|^x86 DLL" and file_magic_cmd="func_win32_libid" once for each tag (for C: at the beginn

Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2005-12-19 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: OK to apply this patch? Yes please! * libtool.m4 (AC_DEPLIBS_CHECK_METHOD) [ mingw, pw32 ]: If `file' is present, use `func_win32_libid' rather than `objdump -f', to facilitate cross-compilation. Reported by Pierre Ossman <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2005-12-19 Thread Pierre Ossman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: OK. Please try this patch. It's a bit simple-minded, but should be fairly safe. You need to regenerate your configure script (and maybe also aclocal.m4 and stuff) to pick up the libtool.m4 changes. Everything seems to link fine now. Thanks for all the help. :) -- Pi

Re: [Mingw-users] libtool, dlls and -lm

2005-12-19 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ getting libtool-patches into play; this thread is archived at http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=9231830&forum_id=5119 ] * Pierre Ossman wrote on Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 01:40:22PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >OK, thanks for doing this. Now I need the output of > > i38