Re: [patch #4072] MinGW/MSYS support in ltdl broken (adds -ldl to LIBS)

Hi Mark, * Mark Junker wrote on Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 03:07:22AM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues schrieb: > > >Please provide more (much more!) information and show what fails -- > >the docs state what is interesting. Please state which version you > >use -- if it's CVS HEAD: you do know what "not stable

Re: [patch #4072] MinGW/MSYS support in ltdl broken (adds -ldl to LIBS)

Ralf Wildenhues schrieb: Please provide more (much more!) information and show what fails -- the docs state what is interesting. Please state which version you use -- if it's CVS HEAD: you do know what "not stable" means? Yes, it's CVS HEAD and yes, I know what "not stable" means. Just want

[patch #4072] MinGW/MSYS support in ltdl broken (adds -ldl to LIBS)

Follow-up Comment #1, patch #4072 (project libtool): I cannot reproduce nor understand this at all. Libtool support for MinGW is certainly suboptimal (search mailing list archives for recent discussions and open problems), it's not that bad. First, mingw does have LoadLibrary (loadlibrary.la is

[patch #4072] MinGW/MSYS support in ltdl broken (adds -ldl to LIBS)

URL: Summary: MinGW/MSYS support in ltdl broken (adds -ldl to LIBS) Project: GNU Libtool Submitted by: mjscod Submitted on: Son 05.06.2005 um 03:44 Category: N