Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 06:40:59PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Do you want the (non)recursive/subproject info as argument to
LT_WITH_LTDL
or
LT_CONFIG_LTDL_DIR
Eek! That leaked in from the ancient past. My first implementation tried
to put the mode
Hallo Ralf,
Thanks for the review!
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Very nice patch! But it mixes up two things, and at that quite heavily:
Do you want the (non)recursive/subproject info as argument to
LT_WITH_LTDL
or
LT_CONFIG_LTDL_DIR
or possibly both? Please redo `libtoolize' output based on
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 12:26:28PM CEST:
Another step towards fixing LT_WITH_LTDL. Here we add an optional mode
argument to libtoolize so that the user can tell libtoolize whether she
is going to subconfigure libltdl as always, or use either a non-recursive
Another step towards fixing LT_WITH_LTDL. Here we add an optional mode
argument to libtoolize so that the user can tell libtoolize whether she
is going to subconfigure libltdl as always, or use either a non-recursive
automake (like libtool itself), or a recursive automake with a top-level