On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:09 -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>
> > When -version-number was added, the major number was decremented as it
> > would later be incremented, however, when major is 0, it fails as above.
> > This patch does not decrement, and, i
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
When -version-number was added, the major number was decremented as it
would later be incremented, however, when major is 0, it fails as above.
This patch does not decrement, and, if -version-number does not
increment later, thus avoiding the test.
Th
Hi,
When lbuilding libpng-1.2.18 on Irix, we ran across this gem:
libtool: link: AGE `18' is greater than the current interface number
`17'
libtool: link: `0:18:0' is not valid version information
This is because libpng has '-version-number 0:18:0' - they really want
a .18. in their library name..
