* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:34:49PM CET:
> On 26 Feb 2007, at 10:40, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >If no, OK to apply?
>
> Oh I see. Sorry, I misunderstood. Yes, please go ahead.
Done, thanks.
Cheers,
Ralf
> >2007-02-26 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * li
Hallo Ralf,
On 26 Feb 2007, at 10:40, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
IMHO the patch below produces a more
readable Makefile.am file and is more maintainable wrt. the next FSF
copyright text change. Would you disagree? If no, OK to apply?
Oh I see. Sorry, I misunderstood. Yes, please go ahead.
20
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 12:09:46PM CET:
> >On 26 Feb 2007, at 00:42, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >>Why not let the match just look for the "DO NOT REMOVE THIS"
> >>line, just as is done some lines below?
> The address range in question needs to select just the first comment
>
Hallo Ralf,
On 26 Feb 2007, at 01:11, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
On 26 Feb 2007, at 00:42, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Why not let the match just look for the "DO NOT REMOVE THIS"
line, just as is done some lines below?
Good point. Please bear with me while I get my environment
together...
The ad
On 26 Feb 2007, at 00:42, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Gary,
Hallo Ralf,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:40:18AM CET:
Log Message:
* Makefile.am ($(srcdir)/libltdl/Makefile.am): Fixup regex to
match Copyright notice change below.
No diff?
Gah, it appea
Hello Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:40:18AM CET:
>
> Log Message:
> * Makefile.am ($(srcdir)/libltdl/Makefile.am): Fixup regex to
> match Copyright notice change below.
No diff?
Why not let the match just look for the "DO NOT REMOVE THIS"
line, just as is
CVSROOT:/sources/libtool
TIMESTAMP: 1.2421 2007/02/26 08:40:20
Module name:libtool
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Log Message:
* Makefile.am ($(srcdir)/libltdl/Makefile.am): Fixup regex to
match Copyright notice change below.
