* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:11:00PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > OK to apply the patch below (HEAD, branch-2-0)?
> > The sh.test test is by no means perfect (it will miss errors on lines
> > with more than one pattern), but better than nothing, and seems to be
> > portab
I need this patch.
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:46:06PM CET:
> * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:29:20PM CET:
> >
> > I'm confused as to whether all this means that my original patch is
> > acceptable or not :)
>
> Yes, your original patch is acceptable, but
