Re: FYI: branch-1-5: SCO/bugfix patch 7 of 10: Improve SCO platform support

2005-11-13 Thread Kean Johnston
- You change shlibpath_overrides_runpath depending on the linker. This makes little sense, as this is a rtld feature, not a ld one. Is there a rationale to this? Yes indeed :) And the interpretation of LD_LIBRARY_PATH is an RTLD feature, but both the SVR4 and GNU ld use it during actual libr

Re: FYI: branch-1-5: SCO/bugfix patch 7 of 10: Improve SCO platform support

2005-11-13 Thread Kean Johnston
OK, thanks. Yes, that's better. I had thought to avoid the extra quoting `\$SCOABSPATH' so that it would be invisible to the user from the libtool output, but the way that is now is ok with me. However, it's a good idea not to carry this into CVS HEAD for another reason: Sometime after 2.0 I ma

Re: FYI: branch-1-5: SCO/bugfix patch 7 of 10: Improve SCO platform support

2005-11-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 08:06:42PM CET: > * Kean Johnston wrote on Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:15:24PM CET: > > > > Ok attached please find the revised patch. > > A couple of open questions remain: > - was the quoting for allow_undefined_flag different on purpose > (i.e., be

FYI: branch-1-5: SCO/bugfix patch 7 of 10: Improve SCO platform support

2005-11-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Kean, * Kean Johnston wrote on Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:15:24PM CET: > >Since this is really for a dying libtool branch, what the heck, repost > >as above. At least it would match your usage pattern with > >-absolute-soname, too. > > Ok attached please find the revised patch. I was unable to >