Re: FYI: libtool--devo--1.0--patch-195

2005-08-30 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:13:36PM CEST: Gary V. Vaughan wrote: If you want to work on this stuff, and I can't persuade you to help us tackle the last few showstoppers Okay, I guess I can look at the release blockers. It does bug me

Re: FYI: libtool--devo--1.0--patch-195

2005-08-30 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:13:36PM CEST: > Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > > > >If you want to work on this stuff, and I can't persuade you to > >help us tackle the last few showstoppers > > Okay, I guess I can look at the release blockers. It does bug me > that there

Re: FYI: libtool--devo--1.0--patch-195

2005-08-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Schwab wrote: | | Every pass basically reverses deplibs, so if you have an uneven number of | passes | Hi Andreas, Thanks for getting back on this, my complaint was more that we don't have a testcase for this failure. I think I'll go wr

Re: FYI: libtool--devo--1.0--patch-195

2005-08-29 Thread Andreas Schwab
Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > >> Gah! I'm lost... These are connected somehow? :-( > > heheh, Hi Gary, sorry. I'm attempting to remove unneeded loops, in case you > hadn't guessed and I noticed this: ># The preopen pass in lib mode reverses $deplib

Re: FYI: libtool--devo--1.0--patch-195

2005-08-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Ah, I see. :-( If you want to work on this stuff, and I can't persuade you to help us tackle the last few showstoppers Okay, I guess I can look at the release blockers. It does bug me that there are too many loops over deplibs, I'm convinced that many of them are n

Re: FYI: libtool--devo--1.0--patch-195

2005-08-29 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, On 29 Aug 2005, at 15:52, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Gah! I'm lost... These are connected somehow? :-( heheh, Hi Gary, sorry. No problem. I'm attempting to remove unneeded loops, in case you hadn't guessed and I noticed this: # The preopen pass in lib

Re: FYI: libtool--devo--1.0--patch-195

2005-08-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Gah! I'm lost... These are connected somehow? :-( heheh, Hi Gary, sorry. I'm attempting to remove unneeded loops, in case you hadn't guessed and I noticed this: # The preopen pass in lib mode reverses $deplibs; put it back here # so that -L comes before

Re: FYI: libtool--devo--1.0--patch-195

2005-08-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Applied to HEAD. from Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The dlpreopen pass over libraries reverses the elements in the $deplibs list. This causes problems when the link pass tri

Re: FYI: libtool--devo--1.0--patch-195

2005-08-29 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, More context please :-) On 29 Aug 2005, at 15:36, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Applied to HEAD. Referring to this? * config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_link) : Add missing bit from Christoph's patch. from Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The dlpreopen pass ov