Re: verbose test output (was: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.)

2010-07-08 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: I am thinking that the many test failures under Debian Linux are due to it using older tool versions such as Autoconf 2.61. Facts, not thinking, please. We cannot read your computer's mind. In this case, the thinking was correct. Many Debian test

verbose test output (was: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.)

2010-07-08 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Bob, * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:46PM CEST: > On Tue, 6 Jul 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >> > >>Perhaps things are not all that bad. While 35 of 110 tests fail > >>under Debian Linux, only these two extra are failing under FreeBSD, > >>OS-X, and Solaris: > >> > >

Re: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

2010-07-08 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Perhaps things are not all that bad. While 35 of 110 tests fail under Debian Linux, only these two extra are failing under FreeBSD, OS-X, and Solaris: FAIL: tests/mdemo2-make.test FAIL: tests/pdemo-make.test It would probably be even more helpful if

Re: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

2010-07-08 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi Ralf, Den 2010-07-06 07:52 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Hi Peter, any chance you could post your patches inline? Thanks. Will do in the future, I hope they will not end up wrapped though... * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:45:28PM CEST: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool

Re: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

2010-07-06 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Howdy Bob, On 6 Jul 2010, at 13:19, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 06:48:56AM CEST: >> On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: >>> Yesterday's libtool was doing quite good with the tests but I am >>> seeing plenty of failures now for all Unixish targets

Re: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

2010-07-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Bob, * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 06:48:56AM CEST: > On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > >Yesterday's libtool was doing quite good with the tests but I am > >seeing plenty of failures now for all Unixish targets. Even Linux > >blows failures all over the place. Not

Re: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

2010-07-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, any chance you could post your patches inline? Thanks. * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:45:28PM CEST: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2009-01/msg00152.html This is ok with nits below addressed, thanks. > Make preloading heed libname_spec. >

Re: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

2010-07-05 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: Inspired by the remarkable progress, I'm bringing up this patch again. It would be good if the progress was even more remarkable. Yesterday's libtool was doing quite good with the tests but I am seeing plenty

Re: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

2010-07-05 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: Inspired by the remarkable progress, I'm bringing up this patch again. It would be good if the progress was even more remarkable. Yesterday's libtool was doing quite good with the tests but I am seeing plenty of failures now for all Unixish targets. Ev

MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! Inspired by the remarkable progress, I'm bringing up this patch again. The discussion dead-ended last time without anything being merged into any branch, but follow this thread to get up to speed: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2009-01/msg00152.html The patch has seen (ve

Re: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

2009-01-24 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2009-01-24 14:06 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Hi Peter, What if the system allows several kinds of prefixes? Isn't that the case on some of the w32 setups (Cygwin?)? Sorry, I did something that annoys myself. I didn't answer all questions. My bad. I don't think several prefixes are a problem in

Re: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

2009-01-24 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2009-01-24 14:06, skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:55:50AM CET: When you open libfoo.la, the preloader assumes that the preloaded library is named libfoo.$libext. I.e. it doesn't care about the libname_spec variable. This patch fixes that and m

Re: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

2009-01-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:55:50AM CET: > > When you open libfoo.la, the preloader assumes that the preloaded > library is named libfoo.$libext. I.e. it doesn't care about the > libname_spec variable. This patch fixes that and makes > lt_dladvise.at pass on MSYS/MSVC

Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

2009-01-24 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! When you open libfoo.la, the preloader assumes that the preloaded library is named libfoo.$libext. I.e. it doesn't care about the libname_spec variable. This patch fixes that and makes lt_dladvise.at pass on MSYS/MSVC (and maybe on OS/2). Cheers, Peter 2009-11-24 Peter Rosin Mak