Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-10-07 Thread Nicolas Joly
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 03:22:10PM +0200, Nicolas Joly wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:43:40AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Hi Nicolas, > > > > * Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:36:48PM CEST: > > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:09:26PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > >

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-10-06 Thread Nicolas Joly
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 02:27:26PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > To the Fortran part of your answer: > > * Nicolas Joly wrote on Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 03:22:10PM CEST: > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:43:40AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > Could you also try the new test s

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-10-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Nicolas, To the Fortran part of your answer: * Nicolas Joly wrote on Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 03:22:10PM CEST: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:43:40AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > Could you also try the new test suite? > > make check TESTS= > > and send tests/testsuite.log for errors. > > G

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-10-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Nicolas, * Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:36:48PM CEST: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:09:26PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Nicolas Joly wrote on Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:57:01PM CEST: > > > > > Here follow a small summary for libtool HEAD on my Tru64 v5.1B > > > workstation

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-10-04 Thread Nicolas Joly
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:09:26PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > I've removed libtool@ from the list of recipients -- no need to discuss > this on both lists. > > * Nicolas Joly wrote on Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:57:01PM CEST: > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:08:11AM +0200, Ralf Wil

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-10-04 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Nicolas, I've removed libtool@ from the list of recipients -- no need to discuss this on both lists. * Nicolas Joly wrote on Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:57:01PM CEST: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:08:11AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > This is a gentle reminder that this issue with Libtool HE

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-10-03 Thread Nicolas Joly
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:08:11AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Nicolas, others, Hi Ralf, > This is a gentle reminder that this issue with Libtool HEAD/branch-2-0 > on Tru64 sh is still unsolved. It'd be nice to get a solution into the > next 2.0 release candidate, should such a solution e

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-07-07 Thread Nicolas Joly
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 03:44:07PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 09:46:31PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:08:11AM CEST: > > > > > > This is a gentle reminder that this issue with Libtool HEAD/branch-2-0 > > > on Tru64 sh

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-07-06 Thread Albert Chin
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 09:46:31PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:08:11AM CEST: > > > > This is a gentle reminder that this issue with Libtool HEAD/branch-2-0 > > on Tru64 sh is still unsolved. It'd be nice to get a solution into the > > next 2.

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-07-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:08:11AM CEST: > > This is a gentle reminder that this issue with Libtool HEAD/branch-2-0 > on Tru64 sh is still unsolved. It'd be nice to get a solution into the > next 2.0 release candidate, should such a solution exist. Stupid question: Does

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-07-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Nicolas, others, This is a gentle reminder that this issue with Libtool HEAD/branch-2-0 on Tru64 sh is still unsolved. It'd be nice to get a solution into the next 2.0 release candidate, should such a solution exist. * Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 07:59:58PM CEST: > On Tue, Jun

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-06-07 Thread Nicolas Joly
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 03:31:22PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:27:25PM CEST: > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:35:00PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > * Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:10:47PM CEST: > > > > > > > > In the mean time

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-06-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:27:25PM CEST: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:35:00PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:10:47PM CEST: > > > > > > In the mean time, i tested the solution where `print -r' and `ksh' > > > tests are swapped

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-06-07 Thread Nicolas Joly
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:35:00PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:10:47PM CEST: > > On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 07:38:59PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > > CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/foosh /bin/foosh path/to/configure [OPTIONS..] > > > > > > and you

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-06-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:10:47PM CEST: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 07:38:59PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/foosh /bin/foosh path/to/configure [OPTIONS..] > > > > and you should provide an echo which does not interpret backslashes > > (one of `echo

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-06-07 Thread Nicolas Joly
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 07:38:59PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Nicolas Joly wrote on Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 09:00:16PM CEST: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 10:37:27AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > * Nicolas Joly wrote on Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 01:02:32AM CEST: > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 0