Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These two changes would make the following patch; OK to commit?
Yes, except you need to modify the Autoconf documentation accordingly.
Hello,
0a) Revert the change to set BIN_SH in Autoconf, [...]
IMHO this is a very good idea.
First, BIN_SH is set in macro AS_BOURNE_COMPATIBLE, but it doesn't belong
there: this macro contains things like set -o posix, which
i) have an immediate effect inside the current instance
ii) are
Hi Paul, Stepan,
* Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 08:55:14AM CET:
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
0a) Revert the change to set BIN_SH in Autoconf, in order to be
consistent.
0b) Additionally, prepend /usr/bin/posix/ to the path walk of
_AS_DETECT_BETTER_SHELL, to
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:20:49AM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
Yes, except you need to modify the Autoconf documentation accordingly.
I checked in the version attached to this mail.
Stepan
2006-03-17 Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* lib/m4sugar/m4sh.m4 (AS_BOURNE_COMPATIBLE):
This started out here and here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2004-07/msg00070.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2004-07/msg3.html
and led to (CVS) Autoconf exporting BIN_SH=xpg4 (don't be fooled by the
patches posted; they do not fully reflect what was
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
0a) Revert the change to set BIN_SH in Autoconf, in order to be
consistent.
0b) Additionally, prepend /usr/bin/posix/ to the path walk of
_AS_DETECT_BETTER_SHELL, to choose the right shell right away, inside
Autoconf.
This sounds good to me.
The
