Re: FYI: ksh88 quote.test fix (was: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes)

2005-11-14 Thread Tim Rice
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Tim, [snip] * tests/quote.test: Do not fail on harmless shell bug present in some ksh88 versions. Actually ksh88 was the one that would pass the quote test before the patch. It was ksh Version M-12/28/93e-SCO that gave me trouble

Re: FYI: ksh88 quote.test fix (was: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes)

2005-11-14 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Tim, * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 07:19:59PM CET: On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * tests/quote.test: Do not fail on harmless shell bug present in some ksh88 versions. Actually ksh88 was the one that would pass the quote test before the patch. It was

FYI: ksh88 quote.test fix (was: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes)

2005-11-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Tim, * Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:23:54AM CET: On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Does the test pass even with ksh88, after this patch is applied (CVS HEAD)? Tests pass on both ksh and ksh88. Good work. Thanks for confirmation. Applied to HEAD and

Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes

2005-11-12 Thread Tim Rice
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Tim, Quite some time ago: * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:41:21PM CEST: On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: : * Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:05:21PM CEST: [snip] : I re-ran the tests using ksh88 and

Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes

2005-09-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Tim, * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:41:21PM CEST: On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: : * Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:05:21PM CEST: : I re-ran the tests using ksh88 and all tests passed. : Must be a ksh bug. : Version M-11/16/88h passes

Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes

2005-09-26 Thread Tim Rice
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Tim, * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:41:21PM CEST: On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: : * Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:05:21PM CEST: [snip] : : Content-Description: branch-1-5-uw.patch *snip* : :

Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes

2005-09-26 Thread Tim Rice
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Tim, * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 10:45:29PM CEST: On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:41:21PM CEST: All UnixWare 2.x versions (and 1.x) are sysv4.2, so the sysv4*uw2

Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes

2005-09-25 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Tim, * Tim Rice wrote on Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 10:20:29PM CEST: I did some work on branch-1-5 to try and get libtool fully functional on UnixWare 7.1.4. I was mostly successful, only the quote test fails. Probably a ksh bug. Which of the quote test lines fail? Did you run the test in a

Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes

2005-09-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Tim, Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:54:05AM CEST: Tim Rice wrote: | I'll look at forwared porting to CVS HEAD if I can figure out | why configure zeros out libltdl/config/ltmain.sh | Good work! Yes, really! On HEAD you need to look at ltmain.m4sh, which I

branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes

2005-09-23 Thread Tim Rice
I did some work on branch-1-5 to try and get libtool fully functional on UnixWare 7.1.4. I was mostly successful, only the quote test fails. Probably a ksh bug. As a side effect, OpenServer 6 (also SVR5) passes all tests. While I was at it I cleaned up the earlier UnixWare releases a little bit.

Re: branch-1-5 UnixWare fixes

2005-09-23 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Rice wrote: | I'll look at forwared porting to CVS HEAD if I can figure out | why configure zeros out libltdl/config/ltmain.sh | Good work! On HEAD you need to look at ltmain.m4sh, which I think lives in libltdl/config. Peter -BEGIN PGP