On Aug 25, 2005, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo Ralf,
> On 25 Aug 2005, at 13:47, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:25:17PM CEST:
>>> There is a wrinkle in the current implementation of convenience
>>> libraries, in that they cont
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 06:16:29PM CEST:
> On 25 Aug 2005, at 13:47, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:25:17PM CEST:
> >>
> >>There is a wrinkle in the current implementation of convenience
> >>libraries, in that they contain only P
Hallo Ralf,
On 25 Aug 2005, at 13:47, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:25:17PM CEST:
On 25 Aug 2005, at 02:07, tom fogal wrote:
we can use a convenience archive or archives to create any other
type
of library (static, shared, or another conveni
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:25:17PM CEST:
> On 25 Aug 2005, at 02:07, tom fogal wrote:
>
> >we can use a convenience archive or archives to create any other type
> >of library (static, shared, or another convenience archive).
>
> There is a wrinkle in the current
Hi Tom,
Thanks for working on this!
On 25 Aug 2005, at 02:07, tom fogal wrote:
we can use a convenience archive or
archives to create any other type of library (static, shared, or
another
convenience archive).
There is a wrinkle in the current implementation of convenience
libraries,
Attached is a patch to make the concept of a convenience archive and
the --preserve-dup-deps option clearer, after much discussion with
Ralf.
This is against HEAD.
Please CC me on replies, I am not subscribed.
-tom
Index: ChangeLog
===
