Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-24 Thread Christoph Egger
> * Christoph Egger wrote on Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:08:39AM CEST: > > Peter wrote: > > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > > > Committed to HEAD. I take it that I no longer need to commit to > > > branch-2-0? > > > > I found this bug in branch-2-0, so the fix belongs to there, too. > > See the

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Christoph Egger wrote on Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:08:39AM CEST: > Peter wrote: > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > Committed to HEAD. I take it that I no longer need to commit to > > branch-2-0? > > I found this bug in branch-2-0, so the fix belongs to there, too. See the recent discussion on

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 06:49:43AM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >>Okay with this fix? > > > >Yes, if it passes `make check' with CVS HEAD on darwin, it's fine with me. > > Committed to HEAD. I take it that I no longer need to commit to branch-2-0? Nobody's finally d

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-23 Thread Christoph Egger
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >>/me kicks self in butt repeatedly. > >> > >>Okay with this fix? > > > > > > Yes, if it passes `make check' with CVS HEAD on darwin, it's fine with > me. > > Committed to HEAD. I take it that I no longer need to commit to > branch-2-0? I found this bug in branc

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-23 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: /me kicks self in butt repeatedly. Okay with this fix? Yes, if it passes `make check' with CVS HEAD on darwin, it's fine with me. Committed to HEAD. I take it that I no longer need to commit to branch-2-0? Peter

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 04:04:17PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > >>+ *" tmp_inherited_linker_flag "*) ;; > > > > ^ > >Shouldn't there be a `$' here? This was what my hint was about. > > Of course there should. The whole attempt to remove duplic

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-22 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | I backed out this patch. It was obviously broken, and I need at least a | bit of time to investigate (and do not want bogus bug reports because of | this patch causing havoc on !darwin). For one, a `$' was missing | (wonder

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-22 Thread Christoph Egger
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > | I backed out this patch. It was obviously broken, and I need at least > | a bit of time to investigate (and do not want bogus bug reports > | because of this patch causing havoc on !darwin). For one, a `$' was >

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-22 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: + # Convert "-framework foo" to "foo.ltframework" + if test -n "$inherited_linker_flags"; then + tmp_inherited_linker_flags=`$ECHO "X$inherited_linker_flags" | $Xsed -e 's/-framework \([[^ $]]*\)/\1.ltframework/g'` + for tmp_inherited_linker_fl

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:51:50PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > | I backed out this patch. It was obviously broken, and I need at least a > | bit of time to investigate (and do not want bogus bug reports because of > | this patch causing havoc on !darwin).

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-08 Thread Christoph Egger
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > Von: Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: Christoph Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, libtool-patches@gnu.org > Betreff: Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin > Datum: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 14:06:37 +0200 > > * Ral

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-08 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:53:06PM CEST: > > > > 2005-08-06 Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > * config/ltmain.m4sh (inherited_linker_flags): Work when output > > > > is an application too. > > > > Reported by Christopher Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-08 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Christoph Egger wrote on Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:16:12PM CEST: > > > > > 2005-08-06 Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > * config/ltmain.m4sh (inherited_linker_flags): Work when output > > > is an application too. > > > Reported by Christopher Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-08 Thread Christoph Egger
> * Christoph Egger wrote on Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 07:12:46PM CEST: > > > > > > If this works for you maybe someone would be kind enough to commit it > > > while I am gone. > > > 2005-08-06 Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > * config/ltmain.m4sh (inherited_linker_flags): Work when

Re: inherited linker flags misses linker flags on darwin

2005-08-08 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Christoph Egger wrote on Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 07:12:46PM CEST: > > > > If this works for you maybe someone would be kind enough to commit it > > while I am gone. > 2005-08-06 Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * config/ltmain.m4sh (inherited_linker_flags): Work when output > is a