Hello Karl, Paul,
* Karl Berry wrote on Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:33:14AM CEST:
> why does gnulib/config/srclist.txt list these files as GPL, as do
> the gnulib file headers, but modules/argz says LGPL, and libltdl is
> distributed with LGPL + special exception?
>
> I don't recall any d
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Before syncinc argz* with gnulib: why does gnulib/config/srclist.txt
> list these files as GPL, as do the gnulib file headers, but modules/argz
> says LGPL, and libltdl is distributed with LGPL + special exception?
For the same reason libc files are l
why does gnulib/config/srclist.txt list these files as GPL, as do
the gnulib file headers, but modules/argz says LGPL, and libltdl is
distributed with LGPL + special exception?
I don't recall any deep reasoning behind the gpl in srclist.txt for
these. Probably just blindly copied? So
[ no need to discuss this on libtool rather than -patches ]
* Eric Blake wrote on Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 02:55:21PM CEST:
> According to Paul Eggert on 8/26/2006 12:43 AM:
> >
> > The basic idea is that source files should include config.h
> > unconditionally, so that we needn't clutter "make" outp
