Re: strings.h in argz.c?

Hello Simon, Apologies for the long delay. * Simon Josefsson wrote on Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:46:30PM CET: > Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Is strings.h needed on any modern platform? > > > > No. > I see that argz.c comes from libtool. Would this patch be acceptable? > I'm cc:in

Re: strings.h in argz.c?

Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We got a bug report about Libtool 1.5.22 and SunOS 4.1.x this year, so > I'm not doing any C89 cleanup on branch-1-5. "this year" meaning 2007? Or in the last 12 months? I searched for such a bug report and found only

Re: strings.h in argz.c?

[ let's drop bug-libtool ] * Paul Eggert wrote on Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:02:22PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > We got a bug report about Libtool 1.5.22 and SunOS 4.1.x this year, so > > I'm not doing any C89 cleanup on branch-1-5. > > "this year" meaning 2007? Or in

Re: strings.h in argz.c?

Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > IIRC that was because I could not get into contact with the bug reporter. My experience is that everyone who's reported a bug against SunOS 4.1.x for several years, is either (1) doing it only because they're worried we might still want to be portable

Re: strings.h in argz.c?

Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We got a bug report about Libtool 1.5.22 and SunOS 4.1.x this year, so > I'm not doing any C89 cleanup on branch-1-5. That's not a problem, I only meant it to apply to future version. (I assume there will be future versions not based on branch-1-5 ;-

Re: strings.h in argz.c?

* Paul Eggert wrote on Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 03:22:51AM CET: > > My experience is that everyone who's reported a bug against SunOS > 4.1.x for several years, is either (1) doing it only because they're > worried we might still want to be portable to SunOS 4.1.x, or (2) > maintaining a computer muse