On 2012.05.15 01:03, Pete Batard wrote:
> Could be that we're
> trying to access unref'd and restroyed parent devices on OS-X, hence the
> seemingly random outcome.
Yup. Confirmed that some of the parents we're trying to access get
unref'd and destroyed before we attempt to access their data. If
On 2012.05.14 19:47, Uri Lublin wrote:
> When I started the implementation, I was not aware of libusb plans
> on supporting hotplug in the near future.
Yeah that's the issue we had with libusb and part of why we forked.
Libusb has been so bottlenecked with issues that should have been dealt
with
On 2012.05.14 20:21, Uri Lublin wrote:
> (I also changed -k option's according to vid:pid of a usb disk I'm
> testing with)
The fact that you tested with an usb disk may explain a few things. In
that case, you're _replacing_ an existing driver (mass storage ->
WinUSB) rather than installing a ne
On 2012.05.15 04:42, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> if you want to dismiss the Windows backend as full of bugs
>
> I never wrote that and I never hinted at that.
>
> This email thread is about just one bug.
Quote: "the Windows backend doesn't really deliver because of this bug
and with a few others".
>>
