On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Jach Fong wrote:
>> When I first read the libusbx introductory info, I thought the
>> libusbx has its own driver as the libusb-win32 had. I was wrong:-(
>> It still need the MS's WinUSB.
>>
>> If it is
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Jach Fong wrote:
> Hi! Xiaofan,
>
> Thanks for your prompt reply.
>
> When I first read the libusbx introductory info, I thought the
> libusbx has its own driver as the libusb-win32 had. I was wrong:-(
> It still need the MS's WinUSB.
>
> If it is so, wha
Okay, I guess the list is working correctly. I guess I am getting two
of everything since people are cc libusbx-dev & libusb-dev in their
replies.
On 06/16/2012 10:18 AM, Chuck Cook wrote:
> TEST REPLY
>
> On 06/16/2012 10:03 AM, Chuck Cook wrote:
>> PLEASE IGNORE
>> This is a mailing list te
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:39:58PM -0600, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> There are two seperate issues here:
> 1) whether or not vendors should be abusing the HID interface to
> bypass problems with the Windows driver model, and
> 2) whether or not these devices should be accessed with libusb.
>
> Let m
TEST REPLY
On 06/16/2012 10:03 AM, Chuck Cook wrote:
> PLEASE IGNORE
> This is a mailing list test. For some strange reason I seem to be
> getting two copies of all posts to this group.
> Chuck
>
> --
> Live Security Virt
PLEASE IGNORE
This is a mailing list test. For some strange reason I seem to be
getting two copies of all posts to this group.
Chuck
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today'
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>> Since I expect a majority of libusb's users are looking for portability
>> so all of HID device users should be directed to use hidapi.
>
> Actually hidapi can benefit from the libusb's
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Jach Fong wrote:
> Hi! I am a newbie on the libusbx.
>
> My platform is WinXP SP3. I use the MS32\Dll\libusb-1.0.dll
> unzipped from file libusbx-1.0.11-win.7z and give it a try.
>
> Following the API document example's steps:
> The libusb_init(NULL
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> Since I expect a majority of libusb's users are looking for portability
> so all of HID device users should be directed to use hidapi.
Actually hidapi can benefit from the libusb's HID backend as well.
You can see that HIDAPI has a libusb-1.0
Hi! I am a newbie on the libusbx.
My platform is WinXP SP3. I use the MS32\Dll\libusb-1.0.dll
unzipped from file libusbx-1.0.11-win.7z and give it a try.
Following the API document example's steps:
The libusb_init(NULL) return 0, it's OK
The libusb_get_device_list(NULL
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2012.06.15 19:56, Orin Eman wrote:
>> I compiled at warning level 4 with Visual Studio 2010. There is a lot
>> of noise...
>
> Good point.
>
> I don't think I recompiled at level 4 since last time we tried it in
> libusb-devel, which was pr
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2012.06.12 14:37, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> I think I have mentioned this before, the new VS11 Beta can
>> not convert the existing VS2010 project properly.
>
> I don't have access to the 2011 beta, but given Microsoft's history with
> Visual
12 matches
Mail list logo
