Since I have a copy, I compiled 1.0.12 with the Intel Compiler. I turned
off the zero length array and unreferenced parameter warnings. This is
what is left:
Building with Intel(R) C++ Compiler 12.1
ClCompile:
* ClCompile (Win32 - Intel C++)
All outputs are up-to-date.
core.c
..\libu
On 2012.06.19 08:28, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Pete Batard wrote:
>> the API is really only one part of it
>
> In a library the API is almost the only thing that matters.
Ergo, you are stating that the resources a project can muster, and users
requests don't matter, as per the exact elements I was bri
Hi! Xiaofan,
The open() function works after changing to release 1.0.12.
What a stupid mistake I had made!! Thanks for help.
Best Regards,
Jach
2012/6/18 PM 06:14, Xiaofan Chen said:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Jach Fong wrote:
>> I test it today on using the Borland C++ 5.0 (M
Pete Batard wrote:
> the API is really only one part of it
In a library the API is almost the only thing that matters. We've
long ago established that the libusb-1.0 API doesn't fit Windows and
that the Windows code has to jump through hoops because of that.
> balance API requirements with resou
