Re: [Libusbx-devel] Jose Pablo te ha dejado un mensaje...

2012-08-30 Thread Pete Batard
Sorry about this SPAM. SF is usually fairly good at filtering it out, but this one still managed to go through. By the way, since libusbx mailing list admins were getting a bit too many alerts for messages that were properly flagged as SPAM, and I don't recall seeing false positives, I have cha

[Libusbx-devel] RFC: libusbx OS specific API calls

2012-08-30 Thread Pete Batard
OK, let's try to strike the iron while it's hot, and get an idea of how we could implement these platform/OS specific calls. And since I'm interested in finding out if there exists a best approach for these kind of implementations, I'm gonna use a fairly concrete example of what we may want to

[Libusbx-devel] Jose Pablo te ha dejado un mensaje...

2012-08-30 Thread Badoo
Jose Pablo te ha dejado un mensaje... Sólo tú podrás ver tanto el mensaje como su remitente y lo puedes borrar en cualquier momento. Puedes responder a través del chat de Badoo. Para leer tu mensaje, haz clic en el siguiente enlace: http://us1.badoo.com/01221587821/in/L4csJbu0ogo/?lang_id=7&m=63

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusb-win32 and libusbK support has now been pushed to mainline

2012-08-30 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 08/30/2012 05:43 AM, Kustaa Nyholm wrote: > On 30.8.2012 4.21, "Pete Batard" wrote: >> >> I doubt I'm the only one who'd prefer an API that solves actual >> problems, such as setting platform specific preferences, over an API >> that's been over sanitized for the sake of abstraction. > > I