Let me add a vote for properties such as location IDs as identified by the
OS. I can se how a general mechanism to retrieve properties would be good.
I actually think it would be fine to rely on the OS headers for properties
names if possible. After all if you are looking for an OS specific proper
On 2012.08.31 20:40, Hans de Goede wrote:
> The reason I'm still responding is that if I've understood correctly,
> the thing sparking this discussion is a property of winusb to treat
> short packet reads as errors.
Yup. That and #20 for Linux and Windows (report OS driver name [1]),
prompted by
Hi,
I'm afraid I'm too busy with other stuff to comment on this atm, luckily
we have a lot of other other capable contributors so I'll let those
evaluate this :)
The reason I'm still responding is that if I've understood correctly,
the thing sparking this discussion is a property of winusb to tre
On 2012.08.31 15:42, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> If I understand correctly you want to provide functions/services
> specific to an OS. The same function would not be available for
> another OS. Am I right?
Yeah, though in this instance I'm thinking more about
properties/attribute than function call
Hello,
2012/8/31 Pete Batard :
> OK, let's try to strike the iron while it's hot, and get an idea of how
> we could implement these platform/OS specific calls. And since I'm
> interested in finding out if there exists a best approach for these kind
> of implementations, I'm gonna use a fairly conc
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> If it is possible, please test with some USB Composite device
> as well. Thanks.
>
>
Sure, we have some webcams and such. I should probably start trying out
xusb, we haven't used it here yet.
Dave
---
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:47 PM, David Grant wrote:
> FWIW, I've finally got a chance to build and test libusb with Windows with
> our software and I'm also seeing the same thing as above (I'm using libusbK)
> with a mass storage device. I was so impressed that everything else just
> worked though
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> [ 0.518200] [11a8] libusbx: debug [winusbx_submit_bulk_transfer]
> matched end
> point 81 with interface 0
> [ 0.518200] [11a8] libusbx: debug [winusbx_submit_bulk_transfer]
> reading 36
> bytes
> [ 0.519200] [11a8] libusbx: debug
