Greetings, I'm currently writing an OO C++ wrapper for libusb. It's
nearly ready for release, but I've been unable to test isochronous
transfers. Obviously, Winusb doesn't support them - but I thought that
libusbK does - maybe it is not implemented w/libusb (yet?).
Using libusb0.sys, I've got n
Here are two links from libusb mailing list, saying to include the
extra libraries needed for static linking in Libs.private in the pc file.
http://libusb.6.n5.nabble.com/libusb-1-0-pc-files-when-static-linking-td43.html
http://libusb.6.n5.nabble.com/How-to-use-static-linking-with-libusb-td5104747.
On 2012.09.04 00:04, Chris McClelland wrote:
> Presumably the same is true for the set-alt-interface call?
Unlike what is the case for SET_CONFIGURATION, there's a
WinUsb_SetCurrentAlternateSetting() we can use in WinUSB, so we're not
limited there.
> If you're interested, the project I'm porti
OK, it's good to know about the WinUSB set-config limitation. Presumably
the same is true for the set-alt-interface call?
If you're interested, the project I'm porting (from libusb-0.1) is
FPGALink:
http://www.makestuff.eu/wordpress/software/fpgalink/
The performance difference is staggering. Th
Just an update. I now have a partial patch for composite support, that
appears to works fine with WinUSB and libusbK, but still doesn't
properly set the interfaces for libusb0.
Part of the problem is that, unlike WinUSB and libusbK, libusb0 doesn't
provide an extra device interface GUID that we
On 2012.09.03 03:51, Alan Stern wrote:
> It's kind of a shame that Windows goes to such lengths
> to provide the illusion of a continuous data stream instead of the
> packetized stream that USB actually uses -- this just causes more
> complications in the end.
But aren't we trying to do the same,
On 2012.09.03 21:16, Chris McClelland wrote:
> Firstly thanks for the lively fork! It's great that libusb is being so
> actively developed.
Thanks. It's always nice to hear from more users making the switch.
> I'm in the process of debugging some host-side code and Cypress FX2LP
> firmware.
If y
Hi libusbx-devel,
Firstly thanks for the lively fork! It's great that libusb is being so
actively developed.
I'm in the process of debugging some host-side code and Cypress FX2LP
firmware. Things work fine on Linux and on MacOSX, but things go awry on
Windows (using WinUSB driver). I coult show y
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2012, Orin Eman wrote:
>
>> > it has a limitation on transfer size. Do you know what a typical value
>> > for MAXIMUM_TRANSFER_SIZE is?
>> >
>> I don't, but comments on the OSR ntdev forum indicate in the order of MB
>> for high s
