Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusbx v1.0.14

2012-09-28 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Pete Batard wrote: >> I also know of several upstreams for other libs who have done >> that and they are not popular with distros at all! > > The great thing with being a fork is we can afford being unpopular: our > users have exceedingly easy means to switch away

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Problems with libusbx 1.0.13 rc2

2012-09-28 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Frank Hibbeln wrote: >> Sorry - I cant seem to find a "Reply" link for a message ( 29869217 ) posted >> by Chuck Cook 2012-09-22 to the list so I hope this will find its way. >> >> The OS is Windows XP. The ap

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusbx-1.0.14 Windows binary release missing MinGW-w64 binary

2012-09-28 Thread Chuck Cook
I just completed am make ~ install from source for a Vista 32 bit machine.Uneventful and appears to be working. Now my Linux & Windows machines are both synced to version 14.I guess 13 really is an unlucky number :-D Chuck On 09/28/2012 07:25 PM, Pete Batard wrote: > On 2012.09.28 03:1

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusbx-1.0.14 Windows binary release missing MinGW-w64 binary

2012-09-28 Thread Pete Batard
On 2012.09.28 03:14, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > As reported in the OpenOCD mailing list by Freddie, the Sourceforge release > of libusbx-1.0.14 Windows binary has the MinGW-w64 binary missing. Thanks for the report. I think what happened is that I started copying the binaries before the MinGW64 buil

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Two Mac OS X patches from Nathan from libusb.org

2012-09-28 Thread Pete Batard
On 2012.09.28 06:20, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > I have created Issue #48 and #49 in libusbx github. Thanks. I agree we want them in. At the moment, I don't see tracking any OS-X changes from libusb as much of an issue, as the backend source is practically the same. In other words, whatever libusb do

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusbx v1.0.14

2012-09-28 Thread Pete Batard
On 2012.09.28 08:49, Hans de Goede wrote: > Most work for distros with multiple ABI/API versions will be in that > a parallel installable package for the new API/ABI will count as a new > package, needing to go through various distro procedures for new packages, > and once in place, there will be 2

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusbx v1.0.14

2012-09-28 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 09/28/2012 02:03 AM, Pete Batard wrote: > I'll start with some comments on distro packagers. Most work for distros with multiple ABI/API versions will be in that a parallel installable package for the new API/ABI will count as a new package, needing to go through various distro procedure