From my point of view. I would like to see libusb-1.0 go through
another iteration or two. Remove the dependency on WinUSB and the other
dlls. Get as many of the core functions working cross platform as
possible.
We may eventually need to migrate to a 2.0 version. But I would rather
not s
On 2012.09.26 23:55, Pete Batard wrote:
> I'll try to dig up the old issue when I have a chance (unless someone
> can beat me to it).
This issue might be slightly different than the previous one, though I
expect the proposed changes for the 2.0 API to fix it.
Basically, the old issue we got with
On 2012.09.29 02:20, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> The thing is that the fork is now much more popular than the
> existing libusb among Linux distros
Alas, still not Slackware 14.0, which was released yesterday, and turns
out to be the distro I use most of the time. :)
> My suggestion is to continue new
