On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Dominik Röttsches wrote:
>>> There seems to be an issue with the communication
>>> between libusbx and the Rasperry's USB stack.
>>
>> The bug seems to be specific to Raspberry Pi so I think
>> we can not help you much.
>
> I'd agree it does. But would you have an
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Zoltán Kovács <0x4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure, but this seems same problem I had before, see
> https://github.com/libusbx/libusbx/commit/2f5023c41d3176e56bf0abc521b7c5f8b1ac4664
I do not think so.
Anyway the patch is now in mainline libusbx.git, so the OP
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Orin Eman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>> Using descriptions like "stupid" for the proposed event names does nothing
>> to advance the discussion on what the API for libusb 1.0 should look like.
>> You, and others, have been given
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 12:54 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
>> On 2013.02.11 14:25, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> I've taken a quick look at Nathan's proposal, and I plan to do a
>>> (personal) libusbx git tree with Nathan's hotplug code merged into it
>>> sometim
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Kustaa Nyholm
> wrote:
>
> > On 12.2.2013 12.29, "Hans de Goede" wrote:
> >>
> >> I know, but I'm operating under the assumption that Nathan will
> eventually
> >> do a libusb release with his code, at which p
On Feb 12, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Kustaa Nyholm wrote:
> On 12.2.2013 12.29, "Hans de Goede" wrote:
>>
>> I know, but I'm operating under the assumption that Nathan will eventually
>> do a libusb release with his code, at which point having API compatibility
>> would be good. And yes I know we don'
On 12.2.2013 12.29, "Hans de Goede" wrote:
>
>I know, but I'm operating under the assumption that Nathan will eventually
>do a libusb release with his code, at which point having API compatibility
>would be good. And yes I know we don't completely agree on this :)
I disagree having API/ABI compat
Hi,
On 02/12/2013 12:54 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2013.02.11 14:25, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> I've taken a quick look at Nathan's proposal, and I plan to do a
>> (personal) libusbx git tree with Nathan's hotplug code merged into it
>> sometime this week.
>
> Cool (as long as it stays personal or e
