On 2013.03.20 09:32, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>> Excuse me, but I must have missed the part where I claimed or even
>> remotely implied that LIBUSBX_HAS_HID_ACCESS meant "HID access using a
>> native driver and without detach, just like it is done on Windows".
>
> Well, the problem is that under
Hi,
On 03/20/2013 02:16 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
>> Oh, and for what is worth, I think over at libusb we discussed the idea
>> of having a _detach() call that did nothing but returned success on
>> Windows, to avoid #ifdefs, but that idea was r
Hi,
On 03/19/2013 09:11 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2013.03.19 18:07, Tim Roberts wrote:
>> I'm not sure I buy that argument.
>
> I don't by that argument, but not for the same reason as Tim (though I
> think that's a valid point on its own).
>
> But let's me first start by the most worrying state
