Re: [Libusbx-devel] [Patches for 1.0.16 0/2]: Allow hotplug users to wakeup handle_events

2013-07-05 Thread Nathan Hjelm
+1 from me. -Nathan On Jul 4, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > So to make sure the API is sane, and to give the hotplug stuff some extra > testing, I've ported Spice's usbredir code over to it. > > And everything worked in one go, until I tried to exit the spice client, at

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [Patches for 1.0.16 0/2]: Allow hotplug users to wakeup handle_events

2013-07-05 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 07/04/2013 08:15 PM, Pete Batard wrote: >> On Thursday, July 4, 2013, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Given that without this patch the hotplug API is essentially >> unusable for >> applications with a separate event thread, I believe we should add >> this to 1.0.16. > > Agreed.

Re: [Libusbx-devel] segfault in reap_for_handle (isoc. transfer)

2013-07-05 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 07/05/2013 12:29 PM, Maximilian Ferdinand Müller wrote: > Hello! > > We're currently developing a device driver for an usb video grabber based on > libusbx. We already managed to communicate with the device by using control > messages (synchronous transfer). > > But we're currently experien

[Libusbx-devel] segfault in reap_for_handle (isoc. transfer)

2013-07-05 Thread Maximilian Ferdinand Müller
Hello! We're currently developing a device driver for an usb video grabber based on libusbx. We already managed to communicate with the device by using control messages (synchronous transfer). But we're currently experiencing some problems regarding the isochronous data transfer which we need