Re: [Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] Linux: libusbx failed to build with --disable-udev (#124)

2013-07-26 Thread Nathan Hjelm
Yup, thats how the netlink support was tested and confirmed to work. Except you should never use that option when building libusb(x) for systems where udevd is running. -Nathan On Jul 26, 2013, at 9:33 PM, mcuee wrote: > BTW, I tested desktop Linux Ubuntu 12.04 x86 and --disable-udev works fi

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] libusbx failed to build with --disable-udev (#124)

2013-07-26 Thread Nathan Hjelm
The thing is netlink should work just fine on almost all embeded linux distros. The problem here seems to be with the cross-comilation environment. I haven’t had a chance to look into it yet but there should be clear indications in the config.log why the netlink test is failing. -Nathan On Jul

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] Linux: libusbx failed to build with --disable-udev (#124)

2013-07-26 Thread mcuee
BTW, I tested desktop Linux Ubuntu 12.04 x86 and --disable-udev works fine there. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/libusbx/libusbx/issues/124#issuecomment-21658699 -- See everythin

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [libusb] libusb-1.0.16-rc10 without udev ?

2013-07-26 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:04 AM, jakubon2 wrote: >> Or alternatively, >> >> does it mean I should revert in Git to the version of old /libusb/ (=not >> /libusbx/)? >> > > Since you do not need hotplug support, you can revert to > libusbx 1.

[Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] libusbx failed to build with --disable-udev (#124)

2013-07-26 Thread mcuee
Ref: http://libusb.6.n5.nabble.com/libusb-1-0-16-rc10-without-udev-td5711991.html The problem seems to be that netlink headers does not seem to work for many embedded Linux distros and libusbx treat that as an error and abort the build process. Probably it should continue and disable hotplug fo

[Libusbx-devel] doxygen issue and a few minor warning fixes

2013-07-26 Thread Sean McBride
Hi all, Can someone review and merge these trivialities please?