On Aug 6, 2013, at 6:02 PM, Vaclav
mailto:vaclav_...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
The basic misunderstanding is that I really do not know how does the XP
libusb0.dll gets into play.
I can have the resulting static library execute the usb_init(), but all I can
do is to load the libsub0.dll.
Are you famil
Tim,
after reading your note I went back to
the ORIGINAL and rather misleading information.
The whole problem was that the device
driver I did recently installed was for Windows 32 and not for this
specific device, as you correctly noted.
I actually tested my software I have
build few months ag
Tim, I really appreciate you taking time to
respond.
I am basically running into a wall when
discussing the issue, for many reasons.
I will probably use wrong terminology
here, please be patient.
The device – LittleWire USB “dongle”
is basically an interface to hardware and the “inventor “
provi
On 2013.08.06 14:57, Alan Stern wrote:
> I agree, it does need to change. This means putting more pressure on
> manufacturers, not on the users.
And how else are you going to put pressure on manufacturers?
If Linus and other kernel developers haven't been able to get nVidia to
play fair, I'm cu
Good catch. I will push this later today.
-Nathan
On Aug 6, 2013, at 2:16 PM, Chris Dickens
wrote:
> When a transfer is submitted, the device is referenced in
> libusb_submit_transfer()
> and unreferenced in usbi_handle_transfer_completion(). This transfer could
> potentially
> be freed by a
When a transfer is submitted, the device is referenced in
libusb_submit_transfer()
and unreferenced in usbi_handle_transfer_completion(). This transfer could
potentially
be freed by any user callback, or is freed by libusb if
LIBUSB_TRANSFER_FREE_TRANSFER
is set in the flags. The call to unrefer
Vaclav wrote:
>
> I would like to have a private contact with someone who could give me
> some pointers about BASIC libusb build and usage in Windows MFC.
MFC is not relevant. That's just a framework for building GUI
applications. Did you mean Visual C++?
> I have been told by "expert" to use
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Pete Batard wrote:
> > The people we deal with are users, not manufacturers. As a general
> > rule, the manufacturers don't listen to us.
>
> Yeah. And THAT needs to change.
>
> Everybody is sick and tired of getting subpar FLOSS support from
> manufacturers, and that inclu
