Re: [Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] Windows: hotplug/unplug support (#9)

2014-01-16 Thread mcuee
@Chirs: Nice. Where do you keep you code? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/libusbx/libusbx/issues/9#issuecomment-32585532-- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Service

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] Windows: hotplug/unplug support (#9)

2014-01-16 Thread Chris Dickens
Hi All, I have been needing hotplug support on Windows for quite some time, so I was eager to start testing this code. I've finally had the chance to, and I think it's a great start (thanks Manuel for your groundwork!!). Here's my preliminary findings: 1) The way that the hubs are enumerated is b

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Isochronous support via libusbk backend problem

2014-01-16 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Tim Roberts wrote: > > This is where things getting complicated. Interrupt or Bulk transfers > > scheduling > > are not time guarantied and 1mS period between two packets is sometime > > bigger resulting > > in very bad synchronization (verified with oscilloscope). > > No,

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Isochronous support via libusbk backend problem

2014-01-16 Thread Tim Roberts
GORAN RADIVOJEVIC wrote: > Sorry, my error: buffer size is 4096, packet size is 256. If I'm > correctly calculating: 125uS*12packets*256byte will give me 1.5MB/s transfer > rate > (3072bytes in 2mS period). The number of packets per request is not part of the bandwidth computation. If you need 1